{"id":2696,"date":"2004-10-06T12:00:07","date_gmt":"2004-10-06T17:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/2696.html"},"modified":"2004-10-06T12:00:07","modified_gmt":"2004-10-06T17:00:07","slug":"did-cheney-accidentally-hurt-the-bush-campaigns-chances-with-cuban-americans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/did-cheney-accidentally-hurt-the-bush-campaigns-chances-with-cuban-americans\/","title":{"rendered":"Did Cheney accidentally hurt the Bush campaign&#8217;s chances with Cuban Americans?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This may seem like a minor point in the grand scheme of things, but I&#8217;m pretty sure Dick Cheney accidentally explained last night why he&#8217;s opposed to the U.S. embargo against Cuba.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Ifill: Mr. Vice President, in June of 2000 when you were still CEO of Halliburton, you said that U.S. businesses should be allowed to do business with Iran because, quote, &#8220;Unilateral sanctions almost never work.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>After four years as vice president now, and with Iran having been declared by your administration as part of the &#8220;Axis of Evil,&#8221; do you still believe that we should lift sanctions on Iran?<\/p>\n<p>Cheney: No, I do not. And, Gwen, at the time, I was talking specifically about this question of unilateral sanctions.<\/p>\n<p>What happens when we impose unilateral sanctions is, unless there&#8217;s a collective effort, then other people move in and take advantage of the situation and you don&#8217;t have any impact, except to penalize American companies.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>First, Cheney&#8217;s attempts to distance himself from his own anti-sanction efforts <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/web\/page.ww?section=root&#038;name=ViewWeb&#038;articleId=8498\">weren&#8217;t exactly true<\/a>. Second, and more politically significant right now, Cheney articulated a policy that is clearly at odds with the Bush administration&#8217;s position with regards to Cuba. Considering the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.miami.com\/mld\/miamiherald\/8864742.htm?1c\">reaction<\/a> from South Florida&#8217;s Cuban community to the administration&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A6549-2004May6.html\">harsh new restrictions<\/a> on travel and remittances, this offers the Kerry campaign an opportunity.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe New Democrat Network, for example, has been working furiously to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newdem.org\/hispanicproject\/miami.php\">rally Dem support<\/a> in the Cuban-American community, after over a generation of loyalty to the GOP. With this in mind, I wonder what the reaction would be if South Floridians heard that Cheney announced on national television that he rejects &#8220;unilateral sanctions.&#8221; After all, that&#8217;s exactly what the U.S. has imposed on Cuba. If Cheney opposes such sanctions, does this mean that the Bush administration, if given another term, might weaken the embargo against Castro?<\/p>\n<p>By Cheney&#8217;s own logic, our embargo isn&#8217;t &#8220;having any impact&#8221; and only serves to &#8220;penalize American companies.&#8221; It&#8217;d be a little fishy, but if Dems played by GOP rules, I can imagine an ad airing in South Florida that says, in Spanish, that Dick Cheney &#8220;opposes the kind of sanctions the United States has imposed on Fidel Castro.&#8221; It&#8217;s technically true and I have a hunch it&#8217;d get a pretty strong reaction.<\/p>\n<p>At a minimum, shouldn&#8217;t Cheney be asked to explain why he opposes unilateral sanctions except for when he supports them?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This may seem like a minor point in the grand scheme of things, but I&#8217;m pretty sure Dick Cheney accidentally explained last night why he&#8217;s opposed to the U.S. embargo against Cuba. Ifill: Mr. Vice President, in June of 2000 when you were still CEO of Halliburton, you said that U.S. businesses should be allowed [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2696","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2696","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2696"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2696\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2696"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2696"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2696"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}