{"id":2794,"date":"2004-10-18T13:57:55","date_gmt":"2004-10-18T18:57:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/2794.html"},"modified":"2004-10-18T13:57:55","modified_gmt":"2004-10-18T18:57:55","slug":"the-january-surprise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-january-surprise\/","title":{"rendered":"The &#8216;January Surprise&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The gloves are clearly off. With two weeks to go, the Kerry campaign is seizing on a handful of Bush&#8217;s biggest vulnerabilities. One of them is obviously Social Security, which Kerry describes as Bush&#8217;s &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/6267559\/\">January Surprise<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry accused President Bush on Sunday of planning a surprise second-term effort to privatize Social Security and forecast a &#8220;disaster for America&#8217;s middle class.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Republicans denied the charge as scare tactics with little more than two weeks remaining in a tight election. &#8220;It is just flat inaccurate,&#8221; said GOP chairman Ed Gillespie.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There&#8217;s a lot going on here, but Bush is on the wrong side of every aspect of the debate. Worse, he seems to be aware of it, but is at a loss to do anything about it.<\/p>\n<p>First, is this a &#8220;scare tactic&#8221;? In a manner of speaking, of course it is. Bush has proposed a massive and radical change to Social Security that will cost at least $1 trillion to the system, perhaps even $2 trillion. Kerry realizes that people <i>should<\/i> be &#8220;scared&#8221; of Bush&#8217;s plan because it <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pkarchive.org\/column\/9600.html\">doesn&#8217;t make any sense<\/a>. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with telling the public about something scary when the issue at hand is genuinely chilling. It&#8217;s not Kerry&#8217;s fault Bush&#8217;s plan is frightening.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the GOP response &#8212; Kerry is misrepresenting Bush&#8217;s Social Security plan &#8212; is entirely the White House&#8217;s fault. The president boasts about a fundamental change in the way this program operates, but he refuses to tell anyone at any level how his plan would work or how he&#8217;d pay for it. <\/p>\n<p>As even Dick Armey (R-Texas) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A27055-2004Aug23.html\">said over in August<\/a>, &#8220;You either define yourself on these big issues or the Democrats will define you.&#8221; It was a rare moment of wisdom &#8212; Bush won&#8217;t define his own agenda on Social Security; he shouldn&#8217;t be disappointed when Kerry does it for him. Indeed, even when blasting Kerry&#8217;s charge as inaccurate, the Bush campaign can&#8217;t say <i>how or why<\/i> it&#8217;s inaccurate because even they don&#8217;t know how Bush&#8217;s plan would work.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nBut the strangest part about yesterday&#8217;s dust-up over Social Security is how Bush and his allies responded to Kerry&#8217;s charge.<\/p>\n<p>Kerry got the ball rolling by jumping on an excerpt from Ron Suskind&#8217;s New York Times magazine <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2004\/10\/17\/magazine\/17BUSH.html?oref=login&#038;oref=login&#038;pagewanted=all&#038;position\">article<\/a>, which quoted Bush (second hand) as saying, &#8220;I&#8217;m going to come out strong after my swearing in with fundamental tax reform, tort reform, privatizing of Social Security.&#8221; Thus Kerry&#8217;s &#8220;January Surprise&#8221; line.<\/p>\n<p>The Republicans went apoplectic, but for no apparent reason. Steve Schmidt, a spokesman for Bush, said Kerry was levying at a &#8220;false, baseless attack.&#8221; Gillespie said Kerry&#8217;s charge was &#8220;just flat inaccurate.&#8221; All of Bush&#8217;s surrogates highlighted the fact that Suskind&#8217;s sources were anonymous.<\/p>\n<p>Fine. Forget the Suskind quote. It&#8217;s probably legit, but it&#8217;s largely irrelevant. Kerry said Bush will push for Social Security privatization if given another term; BC04 said this is &#8220;false&#8221; and &#8220;baseless.&#8221; Are we really just arguing over semantics?<\/p>\n<p>The fact that Bush will be advocating a privatization plan is hardly a secret. In the third presidential <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-srv\/politics\/debatereferee\/debate_1013.html\">debate<\/a>, Bush didn&#8217;t hide his agenda.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I believe that younger workers ought to be allowed to take some of their own money and put it in a personal savings account, because I understand that they need to get better rates of return than the rates of return being given in the current Social Security trust&#8230;. I will work with Republicans and Democrats. It&#8217;ll be a vital issue in my second term.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Kerry is saying exactly what Bush was saying. What&#8217;s &#8220;false&#8221; and &#8220;baseless&#8221; about saying Bush will work on privatization if given a second term less than a week after Bush said he&#8217;d work on privatization if given a second term?<\/p>\n<p>This has been common knowledge for a long time. In August, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/politics\/la-na-security20aug20,1,752164.story?coll=la-home-headlines\">LA Times reported<\/a> that Bush &#8220;has started telling voters that overhauling Social Security would be a key part of his second-term agenda.&#8221; In July 2003, a Bush campaign official insisted that the president will run &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thehill.com\/news\/070903\/socialsecurity.aspx\">big time<\/a>&#8221; on this issue. A month earlier, Ari Fleischer said Social Security privatization &#8220;remains a very important priority for the president.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I have no idea why the Bush campaign is whining now. Kerry is simply engaging Bush on an issue that the president himself claims to be a key part of his second-term agenda. Seems like a no-brainer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The gloves are clearly off. With two weeks to go, the Kerry campaign is seizing on a handful of Bush&#8217;s biggest vulnerabilities. One of them is obviously Social Security, which Kerry describes as Bush&#8217;s &#8220;January Surprise.&#8221; Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry accused President Bush on Sunday of planning a surprise second-term effort to privatize Social Security [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2794\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}