{"id":2799,"date":"2004-10-19T10:58:04","date_gmt":"2004-10-19T15:58:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/2799.html"},"modified":"2004-10-19T10:58:04","modified_gmt":"2004-10-19T15:58:04","slug":"moynihan-was-hardly-on-bushs-side","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/moynihan-was-hardly-on-bushs-side\/","title":{"rendered":"Moynihan was hardly on Bush&#8217;s side"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the third presidential debate, Bush relied on Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the late Democratic senator from New York, as proof of his bi-partisanship on Social Security &#8220;reform.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I called together a group of our fellow citizens to study the issue. It was a committee chaired by the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York, a Democrat. And they came up with a variety of ideas for people to look at.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>By invoking Moynihan, Bush seemed to be suggesting that his Social Security committee worked with the White House on a series of ideas relating to the future of the program. It was an example, we were led to believe, of Bush bringing Dems and Republicans together to work towards a common goal. This wasn&#8217;t even remotely true.<\/p>\n<p>Ron Suskind, whose name has been in the news a bit, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2108361\/\">wrote in Slate<\/a> yesterday that Moynihan, who isn&#8217;t alive to decry Bush, resented the White House and the manner in which it approached changing Social Security.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>As is typical with most presidential panels, the Social Security commission was stacked from the beginning to produce the results the White House wanted. (As I noted in my book, The Price of Loyalty, all members were pre-approved by the White House&#8217;s chief economic and political advisers, Larry Lindsey and Karl Rove. This distressed Treasury Secretary Paul O&#8217;Neill, who wanted more balance on the panel.) But to an unusual degree, the White House felt free to strong-arm commissioners who deviated from the Bush game plan, and Moynihan didn&#8217;t like it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In fact, in one memo between Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy Kent Smetters and then-Treasury Secretary Paul O&#8217;Neill, it was obvious that Moynihan was unhappy.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Moynihan has expressed a considerable amount of frustration that he is not being allowed to control the agenda and in particular, that the White House and Commission Staff are controlling the agenda to a large extent.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Funny, Bush didn&#8217;t mention any of this at the debate. I can&#8217;t imagine why.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nBut as long as we&#8217;re talking about Bush&#8217;s Social Security committee, there&#8217;s something else Bush left out that&#8217;s particularly relevant now.<\/p>\n<p>This commission, which was charged with &#8220;study[ing] the issue,&#8221; so long as their research was consistent with everything Bush wanted, ultimately concluded that partial privatization, as the president has proposed, would cost nearly $2 trillion to make up for the money that would be removed from the system.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, the panel that Bush was bragging about at the Tempe debate reached the same conclusions about the White House plan that Kerry did.<\/p>\n<p>In context, Bush&#8217;s committee thought this pricetag might be feasible. In 2001, Clinton had handed Bush the largest surpluses in American history, we were paying off the national debt at a record clip, and the long-term fiscal health of the country looked incredibly bright. The idea that the government could handle a $2 trillion transfer to handle partial privitization seemed possible.<\/p>\n<p>Conditions, we now know, changed quickly. Record surpluses have been replaced with record deficits, we&#8217;re adding to the debt at a record clip instead of paying it off, and the future looks bleak. Bush&#8217;s plan would still cost up to $2 trillion, but now he doesn&#8217;t have the money. Moynihan would surely tell him this today.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, Bush doesn&#8217;t have the cash, doesn&#8217;t have an explanation, and doesn&#8217;t have the courage to tell voters the truth. Typical.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the third presidential debate, Bush relied on Daniel Patrick Moynihan, the late Democratic senator from New York, as proof of his bi-partisanship on Social Security &#8220;reform.&#8221; &#8220;I called together a group of our fellow citizens to study the issue. It was a committee chaired by the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2799","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2799","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2799"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2799\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}