{"id":2858,"date":"2004-10-26T12:01:49","date_gmt":"2004-10-26T17:01:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/2858.html"},"modified":"2004-10-26T12:01:49","modified_gmt":"2004-10-26T17:01:49","slug":"add-a-q-khan-to-bushs-list-of-national-security-breakdowns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/add-a-q-khan-to-bushs-list-of-national-security-breakdowns\/","title":{"rendered":"Add A. Q. Khan to Bush&#8217;s list of national security breakdowns"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>During the first presidential debate a few weeks ago, Bush was anxious to convince voters how successful he&#8217;s been in executing the war on terror. In particular, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/6146353\">Bush boasted<\/a> about bringing a notorious Pakistani scientist to justice who was selling nuclear secrets &#8212; design plans and components &#8212; to North Korea.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;We continue to pursue our policy of disrupting those who proliferate weapons of mass destruction&#8230;. The A.Q. Khan network has been brought to justice,&#8221; Bush said. He added, &#8220;We busted the A.Q. Khan network. This was a proliferator out of Pakistan that was selling secrets to places like North Korea and Libya.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>On its face, this was an odd thing for Bush to brag about. Far from bring Khan &#8220;to justice,&#8221; Bush signed off on a deal in which Khan was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/fact\/content\/?040308fa_fact\">slapped on the wrist<\/a> by Pakistani officials and is now a free man, living a very luxurious life. As for &#8220;busting&#8221; Khan&#8217;s network, none of Khan&#8217;s cohorts <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/la-na-truth1oct01,1,3899226.story?coll=la-headlines-nation\">has been charged with a crime<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But as it turns out, the back story on Bush&#8217;s approach to Abdul Qadeer Khan is far more troubling. <\/p>\n<p>The White House was told about Khan&#8217;s nuclear-selling network almost immediately after Bush took office &#8212; but they were <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A62727-2004Oct25.html\">slow to act on it<\/a>. Indeed, British officials encouraged the administration to take Khan&#8217;s network more seriously, but the administration pursued awkward and fruitless negotiations with Pakistan, which only gave Khan more time to expand his growing business. <\/p>\n<blockquote><p> [In July 2002,] Blair&#8217;s government argued with increasing vigor, officials of both countries said, that it was time to confront Pakistan about Khan and stop the operation of his network.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We disagreed,&#8221; said a senior U.S. policymaker, who would not permit quotation by name on the dispute between allies. Moving immediately, he said, would have closed opportunities for covert surveillance.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It was yet another costly Bush administration mistake.<\/p>\n<p>Bush eventually struck a sweetheart deal for Khan &#8212; a year and a half after learning of the problem in the first place and after Khan had already helped worsen the nuclear threat posed by North Korea.<\/p>\n<p>Feel safer?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>During the first presidential debate a few weeks ago, Bush was anxious to convince voters how successful he&#8217;s been in executing the war on terror. In particular, Bush boasted about bringing a notorious Pakistani scientist to justice who was selling nuclear secrets &#8212; design plans and components &#8212; to North Korea. &#8220;We continue to pursue [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2858","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2858","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2858"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2858\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2858"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2858"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2858"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}