{"id":308,"date":"2003-02-27T10:19:08","date_gmt":"2003-02-27T15:19:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/308.html"},"modified":"2003-02-27T10:19:08","modified_gmt":"2003-02-27T15:19:08","slug":"george-wills-selectively-applied-principles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/george-wills-selectively-applied-principles\/","title":{"rendered":"George Will&#8217;s selectively applied principles"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While George Will&#8217;s &#8220;analysis&#8221; of current events is generally useless, Carpetbagger&#8217;s brilliant friend Michael pointed to Will&#8217;s latest essay as intriguing.<\/p>\n<p>Will follows the talking points sent to him from the White House to use his column <a href=\"http:\/\/www.suntimes.com\/output\/will\/cst-edt-geo27.html\">to condemn Senate Democrats<\/a> for holding up Miguel Estrada&#8217;s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. While Carpetbagger has already commented on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/2003_02_23_archive.htm#90374085\">Bush&#8217;s rather weak arguments<\/a> in admonishing Senate Dems, Will takes the rhetoric to new heights, or in this case, depths.<\/p>\n<p>The bow-tied one argues today that if Democrats succeed in blocking Estrada&#8217;s nomination, &#8220;the Constitution effectively will be amended.&#8221; Will goes on to say, &#8220;By&#8230;nullifying the president&#8217;s power to shape the judiciary, the Democratic Party will wield a presidential power without having won a presidential election.&#8221; (Well, our guy did get more votes than their guy, but that&#8217;s another story for another day.)<\/p>\n<p>Will&#8217;s argument is practically too sad to rebuke, but simply put, the Senate allows members to filibuster at their leisure. The Constitution requires Senators to give their blessing to the president&#8217;s judicial nominees, and Democrats are blocking this nomination. This isn&#8217;t the first nominee to get this treatment, and hopefully, it won&#8217;t be the last. Republicans have used similar tactics countless times and the Constitution remains in tact.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, come to think of it, Senate Republicans used <i>identical<\/i> tactics throughout the Clinton administration, blocking legislation and nominees as frequently as possible. As Carpetbagger wrote earlier this week, Senate Republicans, led by Orrin Hatch, intentionally blocked most of Clinton&#8217;s judicial nominees for several years in an attempt to run out the clock on his administration and get a slew of right-wing nominees to the federal bench from Clinton&#8217;s successor.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s take a stroll down memory lane to see what our friend Mr. Will said about those tactics at the time, to see if he accused the GOP of effectively trying to &#8220;amend&#8221; the Constitution. Hmm, can&#8217;t seem to find anything; perhaps the cat had his tongue.<\/p>\n<p>There was a 1995 column in which Will smeared Peter Edelman, Clinton&#8217;s nominee for a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, as soft on crime and gave his blessing to Senate Republicans blocking the nomination. Can&#8217;t seem to find any remarks about the GOP trying to &#8220;wield a presidential power without having won a presidential election.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Maybe I&#8217;m not looking hard enough. Oh, here&#8217;s an interesting one. It seems Will was thrilled that Senate Republicans blocked Bill Lan Lee, Clinton&#8217;s nominee to be assistant attorney general for civil rights in 1996. As Will described it, the GOP was fully justified in using petty partisan politics to filibuster the nomination. &#8220;A deeply satisfying and entirely valid reason for rejecting the nomination is pay-back,&#8221; George Will wrote at the time.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, a point from Will I can agree with. Deeply satisfying indeed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While George Will&#8217;s &#8220;analysis&#8221; of current events is generally useless, Carpetbagger&#8217;s brilliant friend Michael pointed to Will&#8217;s latest essay as intriguing. Will follows the talking points sent to him from the White House to use his column to condemn Senate Democrats for holding up Miguel Estrada&#8217;s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/308\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}