{"id":3355,"date":"2005-01-12T11:57:54","date_gmt":"2005-01-12T16:57:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3355.html"},"modified":"2005-01-12T11:57:54","modified_gmt":"2005-01-12T16:57:54","slug":"crowd-control-social-security-edition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/crowd-control-social-security-edition\/","title":{"rendered":"Crowd Control &#8212; Social Security Edition"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Remember the divide-and-conquer approach Bush used in the campaign? He&#8217;s using the same strategy in the drive to privatize Social Security. At yesterday&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/01\/12\/national\/nationalspecial\/12bush.html\">&#8220;town-hall&#8221; style meeting<\/a> on the issue:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Tuesday&#8217;s event, at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium here, was reminiscent of an event in Mr. Bush&#8217;s re-election campaign, when participants selected by the administration sat on stools near the president and made points that underscored White House policy.<\/p>\n<p>At the event, Sonya Stone, a chief financial officer at a financial consulting firm in Virginia and the former controller of the conservative Heritage Foundation, enthusiastically endorsed the president&#8217;s position on Social Security.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What a relief, Bush has won over the staff of the most conservative think tank in America. The next thing we&#8217;ll learn is that Dick Cheney is on board with Bush&#8217;s idea.<\/p>\n<p>The fact that Bush turned this discussion about Social Security into the latest in a series of exclusive, invitation-only events says something important. In the campaign, Bush decided early on that he wasn&#8217;t going to reach out to everyone for support &#8212; he believed he could win by rallying his base. The entire approach was predicated on the notion that he&#8217;d excel, not by pulling the country together, but by splitting it apart. Break the country in half and make sure your chunk is bigger.<\/p>\n<p>In typical poli-sci lessons, however, we learn that campaigning and governing are often mirror opposites. A campaign divides, but governing unites. To get votes, a candidate pits us against them; to get policy accomplishments, a president seeks consensus and a sense of shared purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Not with Bush.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nBy limiting his audience yesterday to those who already agree with him, Bush was making it abundantly clear &#8212; again &#8212; that he doesn&#8217;t care about convincing the country that he&#8217;s right. He doesn&#8217;t think he needs the electorate to gut Social Security, just the part big enough to give him what he wants.<\/p>\n<p>Dems have to keep this in mind in the coming months. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A61686-2005Jan9.html\">Bush isn&#8217;t looking<\/a> to begin sincere negotiations.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The president&#8217;s idea of bipartisanship is, &#8216;Here&#8217;s what I want to do, join me,&#8217; &#8221; said Rep. Robert Menendez (N.J.), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus. &#8220;It isn&#8217;t about negotiating. It isn&#8217;t about compromise. It&#8217;s almost this belief that they have the monopoly on what&#8217;s best for the country.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Dems who approach the coming Social Security debate as an opportunity to negotiate in good faith with the White House are embracing the role of a fool. The president doesn&#8217;t want to convince, persuade, or even talk to anyone who disagrees with him; he simply intends to roll over anyone who gets in his way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Remember the divide-and-conquer approach Bush used in the campaign? He&#8217;s using the same strategy in the drive to privatize Social Security. At yesterday&#8217;s &#8220;town-hall&#8221; style meeting on the issue: Tuesday&#8217;s event, at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium here, was reminiscent of an event in Mr. Bush&#8217;s re-election campaign, when participants selected by the administration sat [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3355","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3355","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3355"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3355\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}