{"id":3394,"date":"2005-01-19T11:04:16","date_gmt":"2005-01-19T16:04:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3394.html"},"modified":"2005-01-19T11:04:16","modified_gmt":"2005-01-19T16:04:16","slug":"hitting-the-ground-running-backwards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/hitting-the-ground-running-backwards\/","title":{"rendered":"Hitting the ground running &#8212; backwards"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s see, it&#8217;s the president&#8217;s inauguration week and he continues to talk about the biggest domestic policy initiative of his second term, privatizing Social Security. How&#8217;s the momentum looking?<\/p>\n<p>* A new Washington Post\/ABC News poll showed Americans <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-srv\/politics\/polls\/polltrend_011705.html\">strongly prefer Dems&#8217; approach<\/a> to Social Security to Bush&#8217;s, 50% to 37%.<\/p>\n<p>* A new LA Times poll shows <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/la-na-poll19jan19,0,838496.story?coll=la-home-headlines\">overwhelming opposition<\/a> among all age groups for a plan that included reductions in the guaranteed benefits retirees received from Social Security &#8212; 23% of those polled said they would support private accounts under those circumstances, while 69% would oppose it. Benefit reductions will reportedly be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A45726-2005Jan3.html\">integral to Bush&#8217;s plan<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>* A highly influential House Republican, who&#8217;s supposed to lead the charge for privatization, has already indicated that he&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2005-01-18-social-security-panel_x.htm\">planning to ignore<\/a> the White House&#8217;s stated parameters for &#8220;reform.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The new Republican point man on Social Security in the House of Representatives said Tuesday that he doesn&#8217;t rule out higher taxes and reductions in future benefit growth as part of a bill that would create personal retirement accounts.<\/p>\n<p>Rep. Jim McCrery, R-La., also said President Bush will have to offer a more detailed proposal for Social Security than he has thus far if an overhaul of the program is to pass Congress by the end of the year&#8230;. [McCrery&#8217;s] subcommittee will be charged with writing a Social Security bill that Bush calls his top domestic priority. Bush&#8217;s proposal will be a starting point, but Congress is likely to make changes, McCrery said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>* And the current Republican chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee apparently <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A19257-2005Jan18.html\">believes Bush&#8217;s plan is doomed<\/a>.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas (R-Calif.) predicted yesterday that partisan warfare over Social Security will quickly render President Bush&#8217;s plan &#8220;a dead horse&#8221; and called on Congress to undertake a broader review of the problems of an aging nation.<\/p>\n<p>Thomas, one of Capitol Hill&#8217;s most powerful figures on tax policy, is the highest-ranking House Republican official to cast doubt on the president&#8217;s plan for creating individual investment accounts.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is on the front page of the Washington Post, the day before Bush is sworn in for a second term. <\/p>\n<p>Is this what the svengalis at the White House had in mind for building momentum?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Let&#8217;s see, it&#8217;s the president&#8217;s inauguration week and he continues to talk about the biggest domestic policy initiative of his second term, privatizing Social Security. How&#8217;s the momentum looking? * A new Washington Post\/ABC News poll showed Americans strongly prefer Dems&#8217; approach to Social Security to Bush&#8217;s, 50% to 37%. * A new LA Times [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3394"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3394\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}