{"id":3509,"date":"2005-02-08T11:37:46","date_gmt":"2005-02-08T16:37:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3509.html"},"modified":"2005-02-08T11:37:46","modified_gmt":"2005-02-08T16:37:46","slug":"keep-up-the-values-talk-dems-were-making-the-right-uneasy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/keep-up-the-values-talk-dems-were-making-the-right-uneasy\/","title":{"rendered":"Keep up the &#8216;values&#8217; talk, Dems, we&#8217;re making the right uneasy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of the lessons Dems took away from the 2004 elections is the significance of fighting for party principles while emphasizing our &#8220;values.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It might seem that the far right, which laments what it sees as a breakdown in the importance of values, would be thrilled to hear both parties embrace language that characterizes policies in a value-laden way. There are signs, however, that the right likes to hear about values, but only from one side of the aisle.<\/p>\n<p>James Dobson&#8217;s Focus on the Family <a href=\"http:\/\/www.family.org\/cforum\/fnif\/news\/a0035441.cfm\">published an item<\/a> last week in which it accused Dems of &#8220;co-opting&#8221; values in some vaguely inappropriate way.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>You&#8217;ll be hearing a lot about moral values in congressional rhetoric this year, from both sides of the aisle.<\/p>\n<p>To Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., the failed Democratic presidential candidate, health insurance is a values issue. To Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., the Democratic leader of the Senate, old fashioned moral values include education and health care. <\/p>\n<p>Bob Mulholland, a spokesman for the Democratic National Committee, said all of the above issues qualify &#8212; and more. <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The most important thing at the national level is the security of this country and the job creation, protecting the environment &#8212; and that includes drinking water,&#8221; Mulholland said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So far, so good, right? Groups like Focus argue that &#8220;values&#8221; should be on everyone&#8217;s mind, and Dems seem to agree. They&#8217;re casing their political concerns in a values context, just as the religious right encouraged Republicans to do years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Apparently, that&#8217;s the problem.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe Family Research Council, a think tank-like offshoot of Dobson&#8217;s Focus, seems to believe Dems should just leave values talk to Republicans altogether.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, said he finds the Democratic definition of &#8220;values&#8221; to be askew, adding that the party is co-opting the term &#8220;values&#8221; &#8212; which he calls &#8220;disingenuous.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Oh, I see. When Republicans talk about tax cuts for millionaires, that&#8217;s a values issue championed by sincere lawmakers. When Dems fight for better health care for working families, that <i>shouldn&#8217;t<\/i> be a values issue and is part of a dishonest agenda. Huh?<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the more the complaints went on, the more ridiculous they sounded.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Are those important policy initiatives? Absolutely,&#8221; [Perkins] said. &#8220;Do they have an impact upon family? Certainly, but they&#8217;re not values that are unique to America.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is what the religious right has been reduced to. Dems talking about values &#8212; health care, education, clean environment &#8212; is disingenuous if the values aren&#8217;t &#8220;unique to America.&#8221; How absurd.<\/p>\n<p>If I didn&#8217;t know better, I&#8217;d say the right is starting to get a little antsy about the lessons Dems learned in the last election.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the lessons Dems took away from the 2004 elections is the significance of fighting for party principles while emphasizing our &#8220;values.&#8221; It might seem that the far right, which laments what it sees as a breakdown in the importance of values, would be thrilled to hear both parties embrace language that characterizes policies [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3509\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}