{"id":3587,"date":"2005-02-21T12:49:30","date_gmt":"2005-02-21T17:49:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3587.html"},"modified":"2005-02-21T12:49:30","modified_gmt":"2005-02-21T17:49:30","slug":"bushs-anti-gay-agenda-bigotry-vs-opportunism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bushs-anti-gay-agenda-bigotry-vs-opportunism\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush&#8217;s anti-gay agenda &#8212; bigotry vs. opportunism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/02\/20\/politics\/20talk.html\">newly-released Bush tapes<\/a> paint the picture of a president who doesn&#8217;t really harbor sincere anti-gay animus.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Early on, though, Mr. Bush appeared most worried that Christian conservatives would object to his determination not to criticize gay people. &#8220;I think he wants me to attack homosexuals,&#8221; Mr. Bush said after meeting James Robison, a prominent evangelical minister in Texas. <\/p>\n<p>But Mr. Bush said he did not intend to change his position. He said he told Mr. Robison: &#8220;Look, James, I got to tell you two things right off the bat. One, I&#8217;m not going to kick gays, because I&#8217;m a sinner. How can I differentiate sin?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Later, he read aloud an aide&#8217;s report from a convention of the Christian Coalition, a conservative political group: &#8220;This crowd uses gays as the enemy. It&#8217;s hard to distinguish between fear of the homosexual political agenda and fear of homosexuality, however.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is an issue I have been trying to downplay,&#8221; Mr. Bush said. &#8220;I think it is bad for Republicans to be kicking gays.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Told that one conservative supporter was saying Mr. Bush had pledged not to hire gay people, Mr. Bush said sharply: &#8220;No, what I said was, I wouldn&#8217;t fire gays.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Since Bush did not know he was being recorded, and there are plenty of embarrassing revelations on the Wead tapes, this is almost certainly an accurate reflection of the man&#8217;s true beliefs on the subject.<\/p>\n<p>Some are arguing that the remarks reflect a president who, in his heart, is a tolerant man who harbors no ill will towards gays. I came away with a far different take &#8212; the remarks reflect a president who&#8217;ll exploit anti-gay bigotry for political gain, whether he embraces intolerance or not.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Indeed, in the months immediately following Bush&#8217;s comments to Wead about downplaying the issue and denouncing GOP attacks, what did Bush do? First, he told a group of evangelical activists that he, as president, would <a href=\"http:\/\/www.texasobserver.org\/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=104\">never &#8220;knowingly&#8221; hire a gay person<\/a>.  Shortly thereafter, candidate Bush refused to meet with Log Cabin Republicans, a gay GOP group, because, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/web\/page.ww?section=root&#038;name=ViewPrint&#038;articleId=4360\">as Bush put it<\/a>, he didn&#8217;t &#8220;believe in group thought.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s more, as president, Bush has not only endorsed a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, but happily enjoyed the benefits of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/002606.html\">an RNC campaign mailing<\/a> that told voters that Dems want to ban the Bible while allow gay couples to wed. Bush may have once felt that it&#8217;s &#8220;bad for Republicans to be kicking gays,&#8221; and he may even still believe it, but that never stopped him from trying to benefit directly from bigoted smears.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/yglesias.typepad.com\/matthew\/2005\/02\/closet_tolerant.html\">Matthew Yglesias captured<\/a> the problem with Bush&#8217;s tack perfectly.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What&#8217;s so especially disgusting about the president&#8217;s opportunistic deployment of gay-bashing for political purposes is that, by all accounts and evidence, he <i>doesn&#8217;t believe a word of it<\/i>. As Andrew Sullivan said of the White House on just this point, they&#8217;re &#8220;closet tolerants&#8221; who know perfectly well that what they&#8217;re doing is wrong. When I meet people who, out of sincere conviction (usually religious) believe homosexuality is sinful and that public policy ought to be deployed to prevent this sinful behavior, I disagree with them, but understand that this sort of deep moral disagreement rooted in faith is a part of life.<\/p>\n<p>When I meet people who, thanks to limited horizons in life, just get a vague &#8220;icky&#8221; feeling about gay people that they can&#8217;t seem to overcome, I think that&#8217;s unfortunate, but I realize that my own perspective in this matter is a question of contingent circumstance (not everyone grew up with liberal parents in lower Manhattan) and that I no doubt have my own blind spots. When you see someone who knows perfectly well that the view he&#8217;s adopted for political purposes is wrong, but who adopts it anyway out of cynical thirst for power, well, then, that&#8217;s just disgusting.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Exactly. Bush&#8217;s approach is the worst of all worlds. On a personal level, he&#8217;s tolerant and uncomfortable with anti-gay attacks, but as a leader of the nation, Bush is more than happy to exploit anti-gay animus as long as it helps him get ahead.<\/p>\n<p>It would take courage and character for Bush to stand on principle against homophobia. Since he lacks both, that hasn&#8217;t happened.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The newly-released Bush tapes paint the picture of a president who doesn&#8217;t really harbor sincere anti-gay animus. Early on, though, Mr. Bush appeared most worried that Christian conservatives would object to his determination not to criticize gay people. &#8220;I think he wants me to attack homosexuals,&#8221; Mr. Bush said after meeting James Robison, a prominent [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}