{"id":3785,"date":"2005-03-21T12:31:49","date_gmt":"2005-03-21T17:31:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3785.html"},"modified":"2005-03-21T12:31:49","modified_gmt":"2005-03-21T17:31:49","slug":"public-still-sides-with-dems-on-nuclear-option","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/public-still-sides-with-dems-on-nuclear-option\/","title":{"rendered":"Public still sides with Dems on &#8216;nuclear option&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To hear Senate Republicans tell it, their gains in the 2004 cycle were a message to Dems: don&#8217;t stand in the way of the GOP agenda. This is a particularly common line of attack when it comes to judicial filibusters, where Republicans constantly warn Dems of a public backlash against &#8220;obstructionism.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But for all their bluster, available evidence suggests the public is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/7240970\/site\/newsweek\">with the Dems<\/a>, not the Republicans.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Republicans, in control of both legislative and executive branches, may push to change Senate rules to make it impossible to filibuster judicial nominees, the so-called &#8220;the nuclear option&#8221; because Democrats have threatened to respond by using procedural rules to shut the Senate down&#8230;. Neutering the filibuster would be unpopular with Americans, nearly six in ten (57 percent) of whom would disapprove. Even one-third (33 percent) of Republicans say they would object to such a move.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Republicans will be quick to point out that the same poll showed disapproval among poll respondents for Dems plans to bring the Senate to a halt in retaliation for the Republicans going &#8220;nuclear.&#8221; That&#8217;s true &#8212; the Newsweek poll showed 46% of Americans disapproving of Dems stopping Senate business, while 40% support the move.<\/p>\n<p>But these results are telling &#8212; and encouraging for Dems. Notice the difference here: the public doesn&#8217;t want the GOP changing the rules by a wide margin (57%-32%), but opposition to Dem retaliation is far more modest (46%-40%). That, obviously, is a 25-point margin against a six-point margin. People are far more uncomfortable with the Republicans stacking the deck than they are Dems bringing the Senate to a halt in response.<\/p>\n<p>This is also consistent with other recent data on the issue. In late January, an <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/public\/resources\/media\/poll20050119.pdf\">NBC\/Wall Street Journal poll<\/a> showed a strong plurality, 48%, saying the Senate &#8220;should maintain&#8221; the filibuster rules already in place, whereas only 39% want the rule changed to benefit Bush&#8217;s judicial nominees. Hardly a stinging indictment of Dems&#8217; obstructionist tactics. What&#8217;s more, it&#8217;s interesting public support for the &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; seems to have gone down, not up, as Republican rhetoric on the issue has gotten more aggressive.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s been considerable debate over the political implications of the &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; and the related Dem response, and it&#8217;s nearly impossible to say how the public would react until the events actually took place. Having said that, it appears Dems go into the showdown with the public&#8217;s support.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To hear Senate Republicans tell it, their gains in the 2004 cycle were a message to Dems: don&#8217;t stand in the way of the GOP agenda. This is a particularly common line of attack when it comes to judicial filibusters, where Republicans constantly warn Dems of a public backlash against &#8220;obstructionism.&#8221; But for all their [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3785\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}