{"id":4062,"date":"2005-04-26T11:21:28","date_gmt":"2005-04-26T15:21:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/4062.html"},"modified":"2005-04-26T11:21:28","modified_gmt":"2005-04-26T15:21:28","slug":"janice-rogers-brown-sees-herself-as-part-of-religious-war","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/janice-rogers-brown-sees-herself-as-part-of-religious-war\/","title":{"rendered":"Janice Rogers Brown sees herself as part of religious &#8216;war&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Part of being a qualified judicial nominee is an ability to show some judicial temperament and restraint. Janice Rogers Brown, clearly one of Bush&#8217;s worst would-be judges, obviously <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/la-na-brown26apr26,1,2263009.story?coll=la-headlines-nation\">doesn&#8217;t understand that<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Just days after a bitterly divided Senate committee voted along party lines to approve her nomination as a federal appellate court judge, California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown told an audience Sunday that people of faith were embroiled in a &#8220;war&#8221; against secular humanists who threatened to divorce America from its religious roots, according to a newspaper account of the speech.<\/p>\n<p>Brown&#8217;s remarks come as a partisan battle over judges has evolved into a national debate over the proper mix of God and government and as Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) ponders changing the chamber&#8217;s rules to prevent Democrats from using procedural moves to block confirmation of conservative jurists such as Brown.<\/p>\n<p>Her comments to a gathering of Roman Catholic legal professionals in Darien, Conn., came on the same day as &#8220;Justice Sunday: Stop the Filibuster Against People of Faith,&#8221; a program produced by evangelical leaders and simulcast on the Internet and in homes and churches around the country. It was designed to paint opponents of Bush&#8217;s judicial nominees as intolerant of believers.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Apparently, Judge Brown was on quite a roll. She described these as &#8220;perilous times for people of faith&#8221; in the United States; she insisted the &#8220;idea of human freedom&#8221; is undermined when we move away from the nation&#8217;s alleged religious underpinnings; and she condemned atheists for rejecting the &#8220;idea of freedom.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So, let&#8217;s put this in context. Bush has nominated a person to serve on the second highest court in the nation that believes <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pfaw.org\/pfaw\/general\/default.aspx?oid=12751\">FDR was a socialist<\/a>, that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/04\/17\/magazine\/17CONSTITUTION.html?pagewanted=all&#038;position=\">minimum-wage regulations should be outlawed<\/a>, that the New Deal was a &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/04\/17\/magazine\/17CONSTITUTION.html?pagewanted=all&#038;position=\">socialist revolution<\/a>,&#8221; and that Social Security should be equated with &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.pfaw.org\/pfaw\/general\/default.aspx?oid=12751#2\">cannibalism<\/a>.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Then, to top things off during the fight over her nomination, she describes herself as a combatant in a religious war against non-believers.<\/p>\n<p>Brown is Phyllis Schlafly in a judicial robe. Her nomination sounds more like some kind of bizarre joke than a serious move to fill an appellate court vacancy.<\/p>\n<p>If the Republican Party still had any sense of decency left, Dems wouldn&#8217;t have to filibuster Brown&#8217;s nomination &#8212; GOP senators would have the sense to vote against her.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Part of being a qualified judicial nominee is an ability to show some judicial temperament and restraint. Janice Rogers Brown, clearly one of Bush&#8217;s worst would-be judges, obviously doesn&#8217;t understand that. Just days after a bitterly divided Senate committee voted along party lines to approve her nomination as a federal appellate court judge, California Supreme [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4062"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4062\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}