{"id":418,"date":"2003-07-17T10:31:18","date_gmt":"2003-07-17T15:31:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/418.html"},"modified":"2003-07-17T10:31:18","modified_gmt":"2003-07-17T15:31:18","slug":"robertson-defends-supreme-court-prayer-offensive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/robertson-defends-supreme-court-prayer-offensive\/","title":{"rendered":"Robertson defends Supreme Court &#8216;prayer offensive&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Believe me, I&#8217;d love to stop writing about TV preacher Pat Robertson, but he keeps giving me more material and I just can&#8217;t help myself.<\/p>\n<p>Today, Robertson did his best to respond to the criticisms surrounding his <a href=\"http:\/\/robots.cnn.com\/2003\/LAW\/07\/15\/robertson.ap\/index.html\">&#8220;21-day prayer offensive,&#8221;<\/a> which, as I mentioned yesterday, asks God to remove three Supreme Court justices so Bush can appoint more right-wingers to the high court and overturn rulings on issues such as gay rights and school prayer.<\/p>\n<p>Robertson, known for his thin skin, decided to take on his critics with a detailed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/opinion\/commentary\/la-oe-robertson17jul17,1,3829040.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions\">op-ed for the LA Times<\/a>. Instead of explaining that he didn&#8217;t mean to suggest that harm should come to the justices, Robertson did the opposite &#8212; he reiterated why we <i>should<\/i> pray that God remove three justices. In the process, he said a number of things that simply aren&#8217;t true.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Americans are a patient and law-abiding people,&#8221; Robertson said. &#8220;But for too long we have watched as the justices on the nation&#8217;s highest court have legislated from the bench. These justices have taken what was to be our nation&#8217;s road map for the people &#8212; the U.S. Constitution &#8212; and turned it on its head.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So far, so good. This is standard religious right rhetoric. Judicial activism, ignoring constitutional traditions, yada, yada, yada.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThen, however, Robertson started giving examples to support his thesis that a change is necessary.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In 1962, it ruled prayer out of the public schools.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>True? Absolutely not. In 1962, in a case called Engel v. Vitale, the high court said public schools could not promote or endorse religion. The case dealt with a New York law that literally wrote a prayer for children to recite daily. The Supreme Court didn&#8217;t say kids can&#8217;t pray in school &#8212; they can and still do &#8212; it simply said schools had to remain neutral on religion. There&#8217;s a big difference.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In 1963, it ruled the Bible out of public schools.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Wrong again. In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled on a case called Abington Township School District v. Schempp, in which the court said public schools could not have school-sponsored Bible readings. Students are still free to bring Bibles to school, read religious texts during their free time, and even form after school Bible clubs. That&#8217;s hardly ruling &#8220;the Bible out&#8221; of schools.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Subsequent federal courts ruled that the Ten Commandments were illegal in schools, that statues of Jesus were illegal in public parks and that prayers on a map in North Carolina were illegal,&#8221; Robertson added. &#8220;They even ruled that it was illegal for little elementary schoolchildren to give thanks over their milk and cookies at snack time.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m guessing Robertson hasn&#8217;t read the Ten Commandments, otherwise he&#8217;d know it was morally wrong to bear false witness. The Ten Commandments are not illegal in schools, government promotion of the Commandments is. Again, there&#8217;s a big difference. If a student wants to put a copy of the Decalogue on his or her bookcover or notebook, that&#8217;s fine. They can also post a copy of the Commandments in their locker, wear a t-shirt with the Commandments, or hand out copies of the Commandments to fellow students. All that&#8217;s impermissible is schools promoting or endorsing religion. The law requires neutraily, not hostility.<\/p>\n<p>And as for the idea that the high court ruled that elementary schoolchildren can&#8217;t say grace, that&#8217;s a total lie. It never happened; Robertson just made this up.<\/p>\n<p>In any event, this entire op-ed is basically an argument that reinforces the same message Robertson delivered to his supporters over the last week &#8212; that fundamentalists should pray for the removal of three justices.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is time for a change, and many thousands of Americans agree,&#8221; Robertson said. &#8220;That is why I am calling for a massive prayer offensive &#8212; Operation Supreme Court Freedom &#8212; to ask God to give us some relief.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He even repeated his &#8220;concerns&#8221; about some of the justices&#8217; health problems.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As I have been quoted as saying, one justice is 83 years old, another has cancer and another has a heart condition,&#8221; he wrote. &#8220;Is it not possible for God to put it in the minds of these three judges that the time has come to retire? With their retirement and the appointment of conservative judges, a massive change in federal jurisprudence could take place.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The man has no shame.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Believe me, I&#8217;d love to stop writing about TV preacher Pat Robertson, but he keeps giving me more material and I just can&#8217;t help myself. Today, Robertson did his best to respond to the criticisms surrounding his &#8220;21-day prayer offensive,&#8221; which, as I mentioned yesterday, asks God to remove three Supreme Court justices so Bush [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=418"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}