{"id":4207,"date":"2005-05-16T09:29:58","date_gmt":"2005-05-16T13:29:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/4207.html"},"modified":"2005-05-16T09:29:58","modified_gmt":"2005-05-16T13:29:58","slug":"whats-in-a-name-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/whats-in-a-name-2\/","title":{"rendered":"What&#8217;s in a name?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkingpointsmemo.com\/archives\/week_2005_05_15.php#005688\">Josh Marshall noted<\/a> yesterday that Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) was on Fox News Sunday, discussing the nuclear option and the likely showdown this week (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.crooksandliars.com\/2005\/05\/15.html#a2963\">C&#038;L has the video<\/a>). In describing the GOP tactic, McConnell used his personal favorite: the &#8220;Byrd Option.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Noting that Republicans have already relied on &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; and &#8220;constitutional option,&#8221; Josh suggested this is the third GOP-approved word for abolishing the filibuster. As it turns out, we&#8217;d be lucky if there were only three. At this point, by my count, Republicans have used <i>six<\/i> different names to describe the same tactic. Let&#8217;s take them one at a time, in the order in which the GOP crafted them:<\/p>\n<p>1. <b>Nuclear Option<\/b> &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3954.html\">Coined by Sen. Trent Lott<\/a> (R-Miss.) in 2003, the phrase was embraced by the Republican caucus until they decided it didn&#8217;t poll well.<\/p>\n<p>2. <b>Constitutional Option<\/b> &#8212; Crafted by Republican staffers <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3067.html\">shortly after the 2004 election<\/a>, when GOP lawmakers started getting serious about executing the plan and realized they wanted something that sounded less apocalyptic than &#8220;nuclear.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>3. <b>Byrd Option<\/b> &#8212; A favorite of McConnell&#8217;s, it&#8217;s based on an <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/index.php?p=524\">inaccurate description<\/a> of Sen. Robert Byrd&#8217;s efforts in the 1970s. It&#8217;s never really caught on, but it lingers as a nonsensical rhetorical device.<\/p>\n<p>4. <b>Filibuster Reform<\/b> &#8212; This one seems to be particularly popular <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3853.html\">with the religious right<\/a> and the Wall Street Journal editorial page. It started popping up in March.<\/p>\n<p>5. <b>Fairness Option<\/b> &#8212; The Weekly Standard <a href=\"http:\/\/weeklystandard.com\/Content\/Public\/Articles\/000\/000\/005\/490oaetg.asp\">came up with this gem<\/a> about a month ago, saying it&#8217;s the &#8220;proper name&#8221; for the tactic. No one else seems to agree, since no one else has used it.<\/p>\n<p>6. <b>Majority Rules Option<\/b> &#8212; John Cornyn coined this clunker in April, but since it seems to run into the Dems&#8217; argument about preserving Senate respect for minority rights, Cornyn didn&#8217;t convince any of his colleagues to use it. (It appeared in a CQ article, so there&#8217;s no link available.)<\/p>\n<p>Please note, we&#8217;re not talking about six different ideas with subtle differences; these are competing labels to describe <i>the exact same tactic<\/i>. And because Orwellian lawmakers believe poll-tested rhetoric is the key to all policy disputes, we&#8217;re treated to this wide variety of descriptions. What a treat for us all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Josh Marshall noted yesterday that Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) was on Fox News Sunday, discussing the nuclear option and the likely showdown this week (C&#038;L has the video). In describing the GOP tactic, McConnell used his personal favorite: the &#8220;Byrd Option.&#8221; Noting that Republicans have already relied on &#8220;nuclear option&#8221; and &#8220;constitutional option,&#8221; Josh suggested [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4207\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}