{"id":4506,"date":"2005-06-22T10:25:43","date_gmt":"2005-06-22T14:25:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/4506.html"},"modified":"2005-06-22T10:25:43","modified_gmt":"2005-06-22T14:25:43","slug":"still-looking-for-a-social-security-exit-strategy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/still-looking-for-a-social-security-exit-strategy\/","title":{"rendered":"Still looking for a Social Security exit strategy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The White House hosted a gathering of Senate Republicans yesterday, and apparently, a couple of lawmakers told the president that they&#8217;re moving forward with their own proposals on Social Security &#8212; one of which does not include private accounts. <\/p>\n<p>Because the president told lawmakers to proceed with their plans, the <a href=\"http:\/\/hosted.ap.org\/dynamic\/stories\/B\/BUSH_SOCIAL_SECURITY?SITE=APWEB&#038;SECTION=HOME&#038;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT\">AP suggested<\/a> that there&#8217;s been some kind of breakthrough and that Bush is now willing to accept a plan that falls short of privatization. The AP, however, <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2005\/06\/21\/ap-blows-social-security-headline\/\">is wrong<\/a> and the White House position has not changed.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Jackie Calmes had <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/0,,SB111938082139765503,00.html?mod=politics%5Fprimary%5Fhs\">a good piece today<\/a> on the politics behind the new, competing proposals and fleshed out in more detail how Bush is proceeding with the broader debate.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To break Congress&#8217;s impasse on his promise to revamp Social Security, President Bush is encouraging conflicting plans from two Republican senators: One would only make the program solvent through future benefit reductions, and another would only create personal retirement accounts for workers.<\/p>\n<p>At a rare White House luncheon with Republican senators yesterday on a range of subjects, Mr. Bush reiterated his commitment to the twin goals of Social Security solvency and new private accounts, senators said. But with his party divided on the issue &#8212; and politically fretful amid Democratic opposition &#8212; the president is seizing on proposals that fall short of his own aims just to keep his top domestic priority alive in the Republican-led Senate and House.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Utah Sen. Bob Bennett (R) has a plan whereby the system would use &#8220;progressive indexing&#8221; to reduce retirees&#8217; benefits. South Carolina Sen. Jim DeMint (R), meanwhile, redirects the system&#8217;s trust fund &#8212; which Republicans have said for months does not exist &#8212; into creating private accounts.<\/p>\n<p>But here&#8217;s the kicker from the WSJ Calmes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Bush aides acknowledge that many Republicans in Congress privately view the DeMint bill not as a way to revive the issue, but as &#8220;an exit strategy&#8221; &#8212; believing it can&#8217;t pass, but will allow them to put Social Security behind them without having to vote to cut benefits.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Sounds like they&#8217;re poised to give up. When Republican leaders are prepared to accept a bad bill they know will lose just to get the darn thing over with, we&#8217;re that much closer to seeing them accept defeat on privatization.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The White House hosted a gathering of Senate Republicans yesterday, and apparently, a couple of lawmakers told the president that they&#8217;re moving forward with their own proposals on Social Security &#8212; one of which does not include private accounts. Because the president told lawmakers to proceed with their plans, the AP suggested that there&#8217;s been [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4506\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}