{"id":453,"date":"2003-07-28T11:56:15","date_gmt":"2003-07-28T16:56:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/453.html"},"modified":"2003-07-28T11:56:15","modified_gmt":"2003-07-28T16:56:15","slug":"we-tried-the-experiment-and-didnt-like-the-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/we-tried-the-experiment-and-didnt-like-the-results\/","title":{"rendered":"We tried the experiment and didn&#8217;t like the results"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the ongoing debate over school vouchers, I frequently hear use of the word &#8220;experiment.&#8221; We should try, voucher advocates argue, voucher &#8220;experiments&#8221; to see if they work.<\/p>\n<p>The Washington Post&#8217;s E. J. Dionne, whom I generally like, had a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A43426-2003Jul24.html\">column about vouchers<\/a> on Friday that suggested that somehow there was a &#8220;middle ground&#8221; between supporters and opponents of transferring kids from public schools to private schools on the public&#8217;s dime.<\/p>\n<p>By my count, he used the word &#8220;experiment&#8221; four times. &#8220;Democrats reflexively oppose all voucher experiments,&#8221; Dionne said, for example. &#8220;I have argued with my friends in the teachers&#8217; unions that they should support voucher experiments,&#8221; he added.<\/p>\n<p>I suppose Dionne and others feel like a major area of disagreement on the voucher issue is whether or not the policy would effectively improve education and the prospects for young people. Dionne, and many others, recommends &#8220;experiments&#8221; to help settle the debate.<\/p>\n<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is the constant drive for experiments when we&#8217;ve already experimented with vouchers and discovered the less-than-impressive results.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nVoucher programs have existed in Milwaukee and Cleveland, for example, for nearly 10 years. Florida passed the nation&#8217;s first statewide voucher program in 1998. How many programs are needed to constitute a satisfactory experiment?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.aft.org\/research\/vouchers\/mil\/index.htm\">Milwaukee&#8217;s<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aft.org\/research\/vouchers\/clev\/index.htm\">Cleveland&#8217;s<\/a> voucher programs, which have been around longer and are therefore easier to analyze than Florida&#8217;s, have failed to succeed in any of the ways their proponents argued before they were implemented. They said public schools would improve through competition, but they haven&#8217;t. They said test scores would improve, they haven&#8217;t. They said there would be minimal fraud and abuse, but <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/000366.html\">controversies have been numerous<\/a>. They said voucher programs would cut education costs, but in fact costs have risen.<\/p>\n<p>Why do we need to keep experimenting? If vouchers don&#8217;t work, shouldn&#8217;t we move on to different methods of education reform?<\/p>\n<p>Dionne&#8217;s column from Friday was something of a pox-on-both-your-houses essay, chiding Dems and Republicans. Dems were blamed for folding to pressure from teachers&#8217; unions, while the Dionne blamed the GOP for refusing to stand behind public schools in need of assistance.<\/p>\n<p>I continue to be confused by the criticism of the Dems. Yes, the party has close ties to school teachers, which I believe is a good thing. But isn&#8217;t it possible that the Dems oppose vouchers because it&#8217;s a bad public policy, and not simply because of the party&#8217;s affiliation with a union?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the ongoing debate over school vouchers, I frequently hear use of the word &#8220;experiment.&#8221; We should try, voucher advocates argue, voucher &#8220;experiments&#8221; to see if they work. The Washington Post&#8217;s E. J. Dionne, whom I generally like, had a column about vouchers on Friday that suggested that somehow there was a &#8220;middle ground&#8221; between [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}