{"id":4656,"date":"2005-07-11T09:24:58","date_gmt":"2005-07-11T13:24:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/4656.html"},"modified":"2005-07-11T09:24:58","modified_gmt":"2005-07-11T13:24:58","slug":"what-rove-told-cooper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/what-rove-told-cooper\/","title":{"rendered":"What Rove told Cooper"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In case you were away from your computer over the weekend, several pieces of the Plame puzzle have started to come together. The newly-formed picture isn&#8217;t a pleasant one <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/8525978\/site\/newsweek\/\">for Karl Rove<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It was 11:07 on a Friday morning, July 11, 2003, and Time magazine correspondent Matt Cooper was tapping out an e-mail to his bureau chief, Michael Duffy. &#8220;Subject: Rove\/P&#038;C,&#8221; (for personal and confidential), Cooper began. &#8220;Spoke to Rove on double super secret background for about two mins before he went on vacation &#8230;&#8221; Cooper proceeded to spell out some guidance on a story that was beginning to roil Washington. He finished, &#8220;please don&#8217;t source this to rove or even WH [White House]&#8221; and suggested another reporter check with the CIA. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>In a brief conversation with Rove, Cooper asked what to make of the flap over Wilson&#8217;s criticisms. Newsweek obtained a copy of the e-mail that Cooper sent his bureau chief after speaking to Rove. (The e-mail was authenticated by a source intimately familiar with Time&#8217;s editorial handling of the Wilson story, but who has asked not to be identified because of the magazine&#8217;s corporate decision not to disclose its contents.) Cooper wrote that Rove offered him a &#8220;big warning&#8221; not to &#8220;get too far out on Wilson.&#8221; Rove told Cooper that Wilson&#8217;s trip had not been authorized by &#8220;DCIA&#8221; &#8212; CIA Director George Tenet &#8212; or Vice President Dick Cheney. Rather, &#8220;it was, KR said, wilson&#8217;s wife, who apparently works at the agency on wmd [weapons of mass destruction] issues who authorized the trip.&#8221; Wilson&#8217;s wife is Plame, then an undercover agent working as an analyst in the CIA&#8217;s Directorate of Operations counterproliferation division. (Cooper later included the essence of what Rove told him in an online story.) The e-mail characterizing the conversation continues: &#8220;not only the genesis of the trip is flawed an[d] suspect but so is the report. he [Rove] implied strongly there&#8217;s still plenty to implicate iraqi interest in acquiring uranium fro[m] Niger &#8230; &#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In an interview with CNN last year, Rove, when asked about his role in the leak, said, &#8220;I didn&#8217;t know her name. I didn&#8217;t leak her name.&#8221; It turns out he was being quite literal. Plame&#8217;s name wasn&#8217;t used, but according to Cooper&#8217;s email, Rove gave up <i>everything but<\/i> her name.<\/p>\n<p>So, what does this new revelation tell us? First, not surprisingly, there&#8217;s been a whole lot of lying going on. When asked about the Plame scandal in July 2003, White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2003\/07\/20030722-5.html\">said<\/a>, &#8220;That is not the way this President or this White House operates.&#8221; More recently, Rove&#8217;s lawyer <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=10000087&#038;sid=aEjeGfPGmLBY&#038;refer=top_world_news\">told reporters<\/a> that Rove &#8220;did not reveal any confidential information.&#8221; We now know this is <i>exactly<\/i> how the Bush White House operates and that Rove <i>did<\/i> reveal classified information.<\/p>\n<p>Second, there are the legal issues.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nThe &#8220;I didn&#8217;t leak her name&#8221; defense is pretty weak. Federal law prohibits the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/politics\/war_room\/index.html?blog=\/politics\/war_room\/2005\/07\/10\/rove\/index.html\">intentional disclosure<\/a> of &#8220;any information identifying&#8221; a covert agent, as well as the <a href=\"http:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/docs\/plame.law.memo.pdf\">dissemination<\/a> of classified information. Based on Cooper&#8217;s email, it sounds like Rove has a real problem.<\/p>\n<p>And finally, I think it&#8217;s worth noting that Rove was not only directly responsible for telling at least one reporter about Plame, he was also <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/07\/10\/AR2005071001000.html\">lying while doing it<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Rove did not mention her name to Cooper,&#8221; [Rove&#8217;s lawyer, Robert Luskin] said. &#8220;This was not an effort to encourage Time to disclose her identity. What he was doing was discouraging Time from perpetuating some statements that had been made publicly and weren&#8217;t true.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s total nonsense. Joseph Wilson was making it painfully clear that the White House was not telling the truth about Iraq&#8217;s weapons program, so Rove &#038; Co. went after him. While doing so, as Cooper&#8217;s email explains, Rove also said that &#8220;there&#8217;s still plenty&#8221; to tie Saddam Hussein to uranium from Niger. <\/p>\n<p>Except there wasn&#8217;t. Rove identified an undercover CIA agent, smeared a political rival, and lied about the Iraqi threat, all in one relatively brief phone conversation. It&#8217;s quite a trifecta.<\/p>\n<p>Drip, drip, drip&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In case you were away from your computer over the weekend, several pieces of the Plame puzzle have started to come together. The newly-formed picture isn&#8217;t a pleasant one for Karl Rove. It was 11:07 on a Friday morning, July 11, 2003, and Time magazine correspondent Matt Cooper was tapping out an e-mail to his [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4656","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4656","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4656"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4656\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4656"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4656"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4656"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}