{"id":4690,"date":"2005-07-14T10:27:28","date_gmt":"2005-07-14T14:27:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/4690.html"},"modified":"2005-07-14T10:27:28","modified_gmt":"2005-07-14T14:27:28","slug":"playing-to-the-base","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/playing-to-the-base\/","title":{"rendered":"Playing to the base"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One interesting part of the Rove defense strategy is its similarity to the approach Rove used during the presidential election: Play to the base. When it was Bush on the campaign trail, that meant ignoring outreach to anyone who wasn&#8217;t a Republican, creating a partisan bubble around the president, and rallying the hard-core sycophants. The past couple of days, I think we&#8217;re seeing something similar in defending Rove in the Plame scandal.<\/p>\n<p>Consider Robert Luskin&#8217;s recent media interviews. After talking to the major dailies last weekend, Luskin has since done two in-depth media interviews. The first was Tuesday, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/york\/york200507121626.asp\">chatting with National Review&#8217;s Byron York<\/a>, in which Luskin told a very conservative audience that the recent mess is Matt Cooper&#8217;s fault.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washtimes.com\/national\/20050713-102719-2189r.htm\">second interview<\/a> came yesterday, when Luskin sat down with Sun Myung Moon&#8217;s ultra-conservative Washington Times.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When senior Bush adviser Karl Rove uttered the now-famous words &#8220;Wilson&#8217;s wife&#8221; to a Time magazine reporter, the intent was to correct errors being spread by former U.S. diplomat Joseph C. Wilson IV, not to unmask his CIA employee wife, Mr. Rove&#8217;s attorney told The Washington Times yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Karl&#8217;s purpose in speaking with Time about this was to discourage them from circulating statements or allegations that were false and soon to be proven false,&#8221; Robert Luskin said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Wilson had been saying publicly that the vice president was responsible for sending him&#8221; to Niger, Mr. Luskin said. &#8220;That was false.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, the substance of such a comment is absurd. Wilson <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkingpointsmemo.com\/archives\/week_2005_07_10.php#006082\">never said such a thing<\/a>. In fact, Luskin has to know what he&#8217;s saying is demonstrably false. For that matter, so does the Washington Times and everyone else who knows anything about this scandal.<\/p>\n<p>So why repeat obvious nonsense? Worse, why publish it uncritically? It&#8217;s not just that we&#8217;re dealing with people who spread falsehoods uncontrollably (though we are); I think the media outlets in these examples matter a lot.<\/p>\n<p>The idea here, it seems to me, is that Rove and his defenders need this a &#8220;he said, she said&#8221; situation, at least as far as the politics is concerned. If they can disseminate the right talking points to conservatives, by way of Fox News, the Moonie paper, et al, they&#8217;ll construct their alternate narrative that makes the base happy. &#8220;Reality-based&#8221; news simply becomes &#8220;the left&#8217;s version&#8221; of this story.<\/p>\n<p>As this strategy goes, it might work in keeping Republican criticism of Rove to an absolute minimum, at least in the short term. Cognitive dissonance can go a long way with this crowd.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One interesting part of the Rove defense strategy is its similarity to the approach Rove used during the presidential election: Play to the base. When it was Bush on the campaign trail, that meant ignoring outreach to anyone who wasn&#8217;t a Republican, creating a partisan bubble around the president, and rallying the hard-core sycophants. The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4690","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4690"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4690\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}