{"id":531,"date":"2003-08-20T09:53:02","date_gmt":"2003-08-20T14:53:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/531.html"},"modified":"2003-08-20T09:53:02","modified_gmt":"2003-08-20T14:53:02","slug":"oreilly-responds-to-controversy-over-franken-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/oreilly-responds-to-controversy-over-franken-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"O&#8217;Reilly responds to controversy over Franken lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>You already know about Fox News Channel <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A46985-2003Aug11.html\">suing Al Franken<\/a> for use of the phrase &#8220;fair and balanced,&#8221; and the suit&#8217;s inadvertent consequence of pushing Franken&#8217;s upcoming book to the top of the bestseller lists.<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday, however, Fox News&#8217; Bill O&#8217;Reilly, rumored to have been the driving force behind the Franken lawsuit, took time out of his busy schedule to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/news\/ideas_opinions\/story\/109845p-99223c.html\">address the suit<\/a> in the conservative New York Daily News.<\/p>\n<p>While most of O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s &#8220;essay&#8221; was more a display of self-pity than an actual explanation of the Franken lawsuit, O&#8217;Reilly nevertheless offered some notable insight into his thoughts on his network, Franken, and journalism in general.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is simply a sorry joke to see a political activist like Al Franken labeled a satirist by The New York Times,&#8221; O&#8217;Reilly said, apropos of nothing. &#8220;Attempting to smear and destroy the reputations of those with whom you politically disagree is not satire.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In a column that was, apparently, intended to explain his support for his network&#8217;s suit, this was the one and only reference to Franken by name. After reading it a couple of times, trying to make sense of it, I&#8217;m still not sure if it&#8217;s a criticism of Franken or the New York Times. The point O&#8217;Reilly seems to be stressing is that Franken is not, in his eyes, a satirist. That, I suppose, is a matter of taste, though I&#8217;ve always found Franken to be a very capable satirist. Why O&#8217;Reilly finds this point worthy of such attention is beyond me.<\/p>\n<p>O&#8217;Reilly went on to launch an unpersuasive defense of the network that pays his salary. &#8220;Fox News has become the highest-rated news network on cable because we feature lively debate and all honest voices are welcome,&#8221; O&#8217;Reilly wrote. &#8220;We don&#8217;t do drive-by character assassinations, and we don&#8217;t denigrate opposing points of view by launching gratuitous personal attacks.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s as if Bill O&#8217;Reilly has never actually seen the Fox News Channel.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nI&#8217;m reminded, for example, of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/000221.html\">a recent tirade<\/a> from Fox News &#8220;journalist&#8221; Neil Cavuto who chastised a professor who criticized the network&#8217;s war coverage, calling him an &#8220;obnoxious, pontificating jerk, self-absorbed, condescending imbecile, Ivy League intellectual Lilliputian&#8221; on the air. Cavuto went on to boast that he is &#8220;slanted and biased.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And as for O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s claim that &#8220;all honest voices are welcome,&#8221; he seems to have forgotten to mention that if the honest voices say things he doesn&#8217;t like, he&#8217;ll <a href=\"http:\/\/demagogue.blogspot.com\/2003_08_17_demagogue_archive.html#106131547971962935\">shut off their microphones<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So much for the &#8220;no-spin zone.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You already know about Fox News Channel suing Al Franken for use of the phrase &#8220;fair and balanced,&#8221; and the suit&#8217;s inadvertent consequence of pushing Franken&#8217;s upcoming book to the top of the bestseller lists. Yesterday, however, Fox News&#8217; Bill O&#8217;Reilly, rumored to have been the driving force behind the Franken lawsuit, took time out [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=531"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/531\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}