{"id":5509,"date":"2005-10-12T10:05:49","date_gmt":"2005-10-12T14:05:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=5509"},"modified":"2005-10-12T10:05:49","modified_gmt":"2005-10-12T14:05:49","slug":"anatomy-of-a-bogus-talking-point","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/anatomy-of-a-bogus-talking-point\/","title":{"rendered":"Anatomy of a bogus talking point"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While chatting with NBC&#8217;s Matt Lauer yesterday, Bush touted Harriet Miers&#8217; qualifications for the Supreme Court <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2005\/10\/20051011.html\">by noting<\/a> the praise she&#8217;s won from others about her skills as an attorney.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I would remind those, one, that Harriet is an extraordinary, accomplished woman who has done a lot. As a matter of fact, she has consistently ranked as one of the top 50 women lawyers in the United States.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s become a familiar claim. In the president&#8217;s weekly radio address four days ago, Bush used an almost identical line, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2005\/10\/20051008.html\">saying<\/a>, &#8220;Beginning in the 1990s, Harriet Miers was regularly rated one of the top 100 lawyers in America, and one of the top 50 women lawyers in the country.&#8221; A few days prior, at a rare press conference, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2005\/10\/20051004-1.html\">Bush said<\/a> Miers has &#8220;consistently rated as one of the top 50 women lawyers in the United States.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s only one problem with the talking point: it&#8217;s not true.<\/p>\n<p>The source of this talking point is the National Law Journal, which didn&#8217;t name Miers one of the best attorneys, but rather, in 1998, listed her as one of the most <i>powerful<\/i> attorneys. In this instance, that makes a big difference.<\/p>\n<p>The ranking has little do with merit and everything to do with access. The National Law Journal, in noting Miers&#8217; &#8220;power,&#8221; merely acknowledged reality: that George W. Bush had given this woman a great deal of authority. What does this have to do with qualifications for the Supreme Court? Absolutely nothing.<\/p>\n<p>By repeating this bogus talking point incessantly, Bush hopes to convince people that Miers is one of the nation&#8217;s great legal minds. As Salon&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/politics\/war_room\/index.html?blog=\/politics\/war_room\/2005\/10\/04\/toplawyers\/index.html\">Tim Grieve put it<\/a>, being a &#8220;top lawyer&#8221; suggests &#8220;suggests someone unusually brilliant and well schooled in the law.&#8221; But that&#8217;s not the case here at all.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the entire talking point follows typical Bush-like circular reasoning. Bush gives Miers power, which makes Miers powerful, which gets noticed by a legal magazine, which Bush uses as a justification to put her on the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p>The president can (and no doubt, will) repeat the line as the process continues to unfold, but that won&#8217;t make it true.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While chatting with NBC&#8217;s Matt Lauer yesterday, Bush touted Harriet Miers&#8217; qualifications for the Supreme Court by noting the praise she&#8217;s won from others about her skills as an attorney. &#8220;I would remind those, one, that Harriet is an extraordinary, accomplished woman who has done a lot. As a matter of fact, she has consistently [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5509"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5509\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}