{"id":5595,"date":"2005-10-21T09:53:09","date_gmt":"2005-10-21T13:53:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=5595"},"modified":"2005-10-21T09:53:09","modified_gmt":"2005-10-21T13:53:09","slug":"senators-tell-miers-dont-call-us-well-call-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/senators-tell-miers-dont-call-us-well-call-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Senators tell Miers: &#8216;Don&#8217;t call us, we&#8217;ll call you&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When a Supreme Court nominee wants to win over lawmakers, he or she tries to use a combination of charm and intelligence in what are called &#8220;courtesy calls.&#8221; As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/york\/york200510201613.asp\">Byron York explained<\/a>, one of the strategists working on Harriet Miers&#8217; behalf said these calls may be courteous, but that&#8217;s not enough to help. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/archives\/individual\/2005_10\/007381.php\">via Kevin<\/a>)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The meetings with the senators are going terribly. On a scale of one to 100, they are in negative territory. The thought now is that they have to end&#8230;.Obviously the smart thing to do would be to withdraw the nomination and have a do-over as soon as possible. But the White House is so irrational that who knows? As of this morning, there is a sort of pig-headed resolve to press forward, cancel the meetings with senators if necessary, and bone up for the hearings.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Apparently, the White House <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/national\/20051020-083137-7609r.htm\">got the message<\/a> &#8212; Miers won&#8217;t be stopping by Senate offices for any more embarrassing chats.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Harriet Miers &#8212; whose courtesy calls with senators in their Capitol Hill offices have been more chaotic than courteous &#8212; has finished the tour, the White House has told congressional aides.<\/p>\n<p>Miss Miers will spend the next two weeks cramming for her Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Republican Senate staffers working on the nomination told The Washington Times yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>The meetings have been fraught with misunderstandings and disagreements, giving ammunition to detractors, both liberal and conservative, that Miss Miers is in over her head.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;No one is walking out of these meetings thinking they&#8217;ve just met with a star,&#8221; a Republican Judiciary staffer said yesterday.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here&#8217;s my question: exactly how stubborn is the White House? Do they hear the complaints and dig in harder, or do they slowly begin to realize that they need an exit strategy?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFor what it&#8217;s worth, Charles Krauthammer offered the Bush gang <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/20\/AR2005102001635.html\">a pretty good way out<\/a>. The Senate needs to review Miers&#8217; White House legal work; the White House can&#8217;t give up the docs; so a convenient excuse arises.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>That creates a classic conflict, not of personality, not of competence, not of ideology, but of simple constitutional prerogatives: The Senate cannot confirm her unless it has this information. And the White House cannot allow release of this information lest it jeopardize executive privilege.<\/p>\n<p>Hence the perfectly honorable way to solve the conundrum: Miers withdraws out of respect for both the Senate and the executive&#8217;s prerogatives, the Senate expresses appreciation for this gracious acknowledgment of its needs and responsibilities, and the White House accepts her decision with the deepest regret and with gratitude for Miers&#8217;s putting preservation of executive prerogative above personal ambition.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My hunch is the president won&#8217;t accept it. The more people say Miers is a disaster, the more Bush will insist she&#8217;s going on the Court. Brash arrogance clouds one&#8217;s judgment on such issues.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When a Supreme Court nominee wants to win over lawmakers, he or she tries to use a combination of charm and intelligence in what are called &#8220;courtesy calls.&#8221; As Byron York explained, one of the strategists working on Harriet Miers&#8217; behalf said these calls may be courteous, but that&#8217;s not enough to help. (via Kevin) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5595","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5595","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5595"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5595\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}