{"id":5609,"date":"2005-10-22T11:19:54","date_gmt":"2005-10-22T15:19:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=5609"},"modified":"2005-10-22T11:19:54","modified_gmt":"2005-10-22T15:19:54","slug":"a-miers-pullout","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/a-miers-pullout\/","title":{"rendered":"A Miers pullout?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When Harriet Miers sent over her responses to the Senate Judiciary Committee&#8217;s questionnaire, it included <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/la-na-miers22oct22,0,1244386.story?coll=la-home-headlines\">a glaring error<\/a> on the equal protection clause. It was, in the words of one NYU law professor &#8220;a terrible answer&#8230;. If a first-year law student wrote that and submitted it in class, I would send it back and say it was unacceptable.&#8221; Another law professor raised a more chilling possibility.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan, also an expert on voting rights, said she was surprised the White House did not check Miers&#8217; questionnaire before sending it to the Senate.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Are they trying to set her up? Any halfway competent junior lawyer could have checked the questionnaire and said it cannot go out like that. I find it shocking,&#8221; she said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The possibility of the White House <i>intentionally<\/i> allowing Miers to provide the Senate an embarrassing response to the Judiciary Committee&#8217;s questions seems far fetched. That is, until you consider a new report from the Washington Times on the Bush gang <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washtimes.com\/national\/20051021-112953-8355r.htm\">looking for a way out<\/a> of this mess.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The White House has begun making contingency plans for the withdrawal of Harriet Miers as President Bush&#8217;s choice to fill a seat on the Supreme Court, conservative sources said yesterday.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;White House senior staff are starting to ask outside people, saying, &#8216;We&#8217;re not discussing pulling out her nomination, but if we were to, do you have any advice as to how we should do it?&#8217; &#8221; a conservative Republican with ties to the White House told The Washington Times.<\/p>\n<p>The White House denied making such calls. &#8220;Absolutely not true,&#8221; White House spokesman Trent Duffy said.<\/p>\n<p>But the conservative political consultant said that he had received such a query from Sara Taylor, director of the Office of White House Political Affairs. Miss Taylor denied making any such calls.<\/p>\n<p>A second Republican, who is the leader of a conservative interest group and has ties to the White House, confirmed that calls are being made to a select group of conservative activists who are not employed by the government.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The political people in the White House are very worried about how she will do in the hearings,&#8221; the second conservative leader said. &#8220;I think they have finally awakened.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There are plenty of categorical denials here, but unfortunately, the Bush White House&#8217;s record on categorical denials isn&#8217;t reassuring. It seems hard to believe prominent conservative players could make this up out of whole cloth.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe it helps explain why online traders starting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkingpointsmemo.com\/archives\/006807.php\">selling aggressively yesterday<\/a>, betting against her confirmation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When Harriet Miers sent over her responses to the Senate Judiciary Committee&#8217;s questionnaire, it included a glaring error on the equal protection clause. It was, in the words of one NYU law professor &#8220;a terrible answer&#8230;. If a first-year law student wrote that and submitted it in class, I would send it back and say [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5609","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5609","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5609"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5609\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5609"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5609"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5609"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}