{"id":5666,"date":"2005-10-28T10:24:48","date_gmt":"2005-10-28T14:24:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=5666"},"modified":"2005-10-28T10:24:48","modified_gmt":"2005-10-28T14:24:48","slug":"bush-has-only-himself-to-blame","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bush-has-only-himself-to-blame\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush has only himself to blame"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One question about Harriet Miers that&#8217;s never been clear is how, exactly, she got nominated in the first place. With a White House filled with successful political operatives, who thought this was a good idea? The Washington Post <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/27\/AR2005102702398.html\">noted today<\/a> that one person was instrumental.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>President Bush bypassed his own selection process to pick Miers, his onetime personal lawyer and White House counsel since February. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>As Bush thought about the next opening he would have to fill, he focused increasingly on Miers&#8230;. It was a back-channel process. Since Miers was in charge of the selection apparatus, White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. instructed Miers&#8217;s deputy, William Kelley, to secretly vet her. She was not told she was a candidate until two weeks before her nomination, and no one had done a thorough search of her background to turn up past writings and speeches that would later become public.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Bush repeatedly defended Miers in the week after her nomination by saying, &#8220;She&#8217;s my pick.&#8221; Apparently, he meant that quite literally. Left to his own devices, the president believed a mediocre lawyer with no record or accomplishments was the most qualified person in the entire country for the Supreme Court. It&#8217;s worth taking a moment to consider what that tells us about the president.<\/p>\n<p>Six years ago, Americans seemed to realize that George W. Bush was a simple man with neither intellectual curiosity nor expertise in any area of public policy. Voters were assured, however, there was no cause for concern &#8212; he&#8217;d be surrounded by capable and experienced advisors. But in the case of a high court vacancy, Bush ignored advice, relied on his so-called &#8220;instincts,&#8221; and made the call.<\/p>\n<p>In this sense, this fiasco is a helpful reminder, in case there was any doubt, of just how few clothes the emperor really has.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIn the LA Times today, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/opinion\/commentary\/la-oe-chait28oct28,0,4605121.column?coll=la-news-comment-opinions\">Jonathan Chait notes<\/a> that Rove played almost no role at all in the Miers debacle, which only helps to reemphasize the president&#8217;s dependence on his &#8220;architect,&#8221; despite efforts by the right to downplay the significance of their relationship.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The reason conservatives have been so invested in downplaying Rove&#8217;s influence, of course, is that the notion of an all-powerful advisor speaks poorly of the president. One book-turned-documentary labeled Rove &#8220;Bush&#8217;s Brain.&#8221; If Rove is Bush&#8217;s brain, then Bush doesn&#8217;t have much of a brain of his own, and Republicans don&#8217;t like that idea one bit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Republicans don&#8217;t have to like it, but that won&#8217;t change the truth.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One question about Harriet Miers that&#8217;s never been clear is how, exactly, she got nominated in the first place. With a White House filled with successful political operatives, who thought this was a good idea? The Washington Post noted today that one person was instrumental. President Bush bypassed his own selection process to pick Miers, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5666","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5666","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5666"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5666\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5666"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5666"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5666"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}