{"id":5703,"date":"2005-11-01T10:30:26","date_gmt":"2005-11-01T15:30:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=5703"},"modified":"2005-11-01T10:30:26","modified_gmt":"2005-11-01T15:30:26","slug":"wal-marts-curious-sweetheart-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wal-marts-curious-sweetheart-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"Wal-Mart&#8217;s curious sweetheart deal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Back in February, we learned about Wal-Mart agreeing to pay a fine as part of a federal investigation into a series of child-labor law violations. It was a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/3541.html\">ridiculously good deal<\/a> for the corporate behemoth &#8212; Wal-Mart had allegedly run afoul of 24 violations in several states, including having minors operating dangerous heavy machinery<\/p>\n<p>The agreement between the Labor Department and the company, however, went well beyond the norm. Not only was the agreement kept secret for weeks, but it also included a provision that promised to give Wal-Mart 15 days&#8217; notice before the Labor Department investigates any other &#8220;wage and hour&#8221; accusations. In other words, Bush&#8217;s Labor Department found a company violating child-labor laws, then promised to give the company lots of warning before they check again in the future. A Labor Department investigator asked at the time, &#8220;With child labor cases involving the use of hazardous machinery, why give 15 days&#8217; notice before we can do an investigation? What&#8217;s the rationale?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>After pressure from congressional Dems, the Labor Department looked into the sweetheart deal. It turns out the &#8220;arrangement&#8221; was <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/11\/01\/national\/01labor.html\">even worse<\/a> than originally thought.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Labor Department&#8217;s inspector general strongly criticized department officials yesterday for &#8220;serious breakdowns&#8221; in procedures involving an agreement promising Wal-Mart Stores 15 days&#8217; notice before labor investigators would inspect its stores for child labor violations.<\/p>\n<p>The report by the inspector general faulted department officials for making &#8220;significant concessions&#8221; to Wal-Mart, the nation&#8217;s largest retailer, without obtaining anything in return. The report also criticized department officials for letting Wal-Mart lawyers write substantial parts of the settlement and for leaving the department&#8217;s own legal division out of the settlement process.<\/p>\n<p>The report said that in granting Wal-Mart the 15-day notice, the Wage and Hour Division violated its own handbook. It added that agreeing to let Wal-Mart jointly develop news releases about the settlement with the department violated Labor Department policies.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Bush&#8217;s Labor Department was doing special favors for a company that contributed heavily to Republicans, even after it&#8217;s caught repeatedly violating child-labor laws? Who would have guessed?<\/p>\n<p>Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), who requested the inspector general&#8217;s investigation in the first place, said, &#8220;The sweetheart deal put Wal-Mart employees at risk, undermined government effectiveness, and further undermined public confidence that the government is acting on its behalf.&#8221; Sounds right to me.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Back in February, we learned about Wal-Mart agreeing to pay a fine as part of a federal investigation into a series of child-labor law violations. It was a ridiculously good deal for the corporate behemoth &#8212; Wal-Mart had allegedly run afoul of 24 violations in several states, including having minors operating dangerous heavy machinery The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5703"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5703\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}