{"id":578,"date":"2003-09-02T10:27:19","date_gmt":"2003-09-02T15:27:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/578.html"},"modified":"2003-09-02T10:27:19","modified_gmt":"2003-09-02T15:27:19","slug":"bush-campaign-asks-its-supporters-to-believe-that-dems-have-more-money","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bush-campaign-asks-its-supporters-to-believe-that-dems-have-more-money\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush campaign asks its supporters to believe that Dems have more money"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After having written dozens of fundraising letters, I can appreciate that a certain amount of hyperbole is acceptable when asking for a contribution. The threat the letter identifies &#8212; a campaign rival, dangerous legislation, a severe lack of resources, etc. &#8212; has to at least sound serious or your donors won&#8217;t feel inclined to write a check.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, it&#8217;s important not to actually lie. Hyping a potential threat is one thing, making stuff up about that threat is another.<\/p>\n<p>Friend and fellow blogger <a href=\"http:\/\/www.samfelder.com\/archives\/000208.html\">Sam Felder<\/a> linked the other day to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.suntimes.com\/output\/elect\/cst-nws-bush29.html\">a Chicago Sun-Times article<\/a> highlighting the Bush campaign&#8217;s latest fundraising strategy. Unfortunately, Bush&#8217;s team isn&#8217;t using exaggerations or minor overstatements; they&#8217;re just not telling the truth.  <\/p>\n<p>As the Sun-Times mentioned, the Bush campaign is &#8220;appealing for donations by portraying Bush as a fund-raising underdog who won&#8217;t have enough cash to defend himself against Democratic attacks.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Democrats and their allies will have more money to spend attacking the president during the nomination battle than we will have to defend him,&#8221; campaign chairman Marc Racicot wrote in the fund-raising e-mail sent last week.<\/p>\n<p>This is crazy. Bush is a fundraising machine. In just the second quarter, he raised $34 million, which was considerably more than his nine Democratic opponents combined. Bush is on pace to collect over $200 million for his re-election campaign &#8212; more than any other candidate has ever raised.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIndeed, if there&#8217;s one inescapable fact of politics in America, it&#8217;s that the GOP will <i>always<\/i> raise more money. It was true before McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform legislation became law, and it will be even easier now.<\/p>\n<p>Just a few days after Racicot&#8217;s claim hit GOP mailboxes, data released by the Federal Election Commission showed that the Republican fundraising advantage over Dems is already huge.<\/p>\n<p>The federally registered GOP campaign committees &#8212; including the RNC, the GOP congressional campaign committees and some state and local party accounts &#8212; have raised a combined $139 million in the first six months of this year. Democratic campaign committees, meanwhile, have raised a combined $56 million, which is only 40% of the GOP total.<\/p>\n<p>As the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A11745-2003Sep1.html\">Washington Post mentioned<\/a> this morning, comparisons between specific partisan committees paints an embarrassing portrait.<\/p>\n<p>The RNC raised $56 million in the first six months of the year; the DNC raised $19 million. The RNC has $22 million in cash-on-hand; the DNC has $5.7 million. The Senatorial Committee raised $14 million; the DSCC raised $11 million. The National Republican Congressional Committee raised $45 million; the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee took in $14 million.<\/p>\n<p>And Marc Racicot wants his donors to believe that Bush will be at a fundraising disadvantage? He must think less of his Republican supporters than I do.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After having written dozens of fundraising letters, I can appreciate that a certain amount of hyperbole is acceptable when asking for a contribution. The threat the letter identifies &#8212; a campaign rival, dangerous legislation, a severe lack of resources, etc. &#8212; has to at least sound serious or your donors won&#8217;t feel inclined to write [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=578"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/578\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}