{"id":5846,"date":"2005-11-16T09:11:07","date_gmt":"2005-11-16T14:11:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=5846"},"modified":"2005-11-16T09:11:07","modified_gmt":"2005-11-16T14:11:07","slug":"woodward-has-some-explaining-to-do","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/woodward-has-some-explaining-to-do\/","title":{"rendered":"Woodward has some explaining to do"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Washington Post&#8217;s Bob Woodward has consistently downplayed the significance of the Plame scandal. He&#8217;s said there were &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/4870.html\">reasonable grounds<\/a>&#8221; for the White House to go after Joseph Wilson; he&#8217;s dismissed the Plame leak as &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.editorandpublisher.com\/eandp\/news\/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001480714\">gossip<\/a>&#8220;; and said he had no &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.editorandpublisher.com\/eandp\/news\/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001480714\">bombshell<\/a>&#8221; to share.<\/p>\n<p>As it turns out, however, Woodward had a first-hand view of this story <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/11\/15\/AR2005111501857.html\">from the very beginning<\/a>. In fact, it appears he was the very first reporter to receive the leak.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward testified under oath Monday in the CIA leak case that a senior administration official told him about CIA operative Valerie Plame and her position at the agency nearly a month before her identity was disclosed.<\/p>\n<p>In a more than two-hour deposition, Woodward told Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald that the official casually told him in mid-June 2003 that Plame worked as a CIA analyst on weapons of mass destruction, and that he did not believe the information to be classified or sensitive, according to a statement Woodward released yesterday.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>To say this raises more questions than answers is a dramatic understatement. Unfortunately, Woodward is being pretty tight-lipped about the details &#8212; as the WaPo noted, Woodward &#8220;would not answer any questions, including those not governed by his confidentiality agreement with sources.&#8221; How terribly Miller-esque of him.<\/p>\n<p>This is not to say that there&#8217;s no news here; there is. Woodward reportedly received the Plame leak before Bob Novak from a still-unnamed White House source, though apparently neither Rove nor Libby told him. Woodward didn&#8217;t tell his editors or colleagues, though he claims to have mentioned it to reporter Walter Pincus at the time. Pincus denied this yesterday, saying, &#8220;Are you kidding? I certainly would have remembered that.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So, what does all of this mean? We&#8217;ll know more in the coming days, but here are a few points to keep in mind:<\/p>\n<p>* Woodward&#8217;s source recently told Patrick Fitzgerald about his or her role in the leak. Why?<\/p>\n<p>* Woodward needs to explain why he&#8217;s been discussing &#8212; and dismissing &#8212; publicly without disclosing to anyone (including his editors) that he knew far more than he was letting on.<\/p>\n<p>* And as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/archives\/individual\/2005_11\/007573.php\">Kevin noted<\/a>, the &#8220;Plame investigation is alive and well and continuing to make progress. Fasten your seatbelts.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Washington Post&#8217;s Bob Woodward has consistently downplayed the significance of the Plame scandal. He&#8217;s said there were &#8220;reasonable grounds&#8221; for the White House to go after Joseph Wilson; he&#8217;s dismissed the Plame leak as &#8220;gossip&#8220;; and said he had no &#8220;bombshell&#8221; to share. As it turns out, however, Woodward had a first-hand view of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5846\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}