{"id":5903,"date":"2005-11-22T11:19:45","date_gmt":"2005-11-22T16:19:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=5903"},"modified":"2005-11-22T11:19:45","modified_gmt":"2005-11-22T16:19:45","slug":"mccain-graham-and-the-gops-problems","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/mccain-graham-and-the-gops-problems\/","title":{"rendered":"McCain, Graham, and the GOP&#8217;s problems"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) did some appearances together in South Carolina yesterday, and were about half right about <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/wireStory?id=1334542\">their party&#8217;s troubles<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>With the war in Iraq, higher energy costs and breakneck government spending, the GOP faces a tough round of congressional elections in 2006 unless things change, two key Republican senators warned during a campaign appearance.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I think if this were not an odd-numbered year, we would have great difficulties,&#8221; said U.S. Sen. John McCain of Arizona. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>The party must show &#8220;progress in Iraq, we need a comprehensive energy package and we need to stop this profligate spending,&#8221; he warned.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Some of this, I can agree with. If the Republicans demonstrated an ability to plan for a better future in Iraq, I&#8217;m sure Americans would feel a lot better. If the GOP had the capacity to craft a comprehensive energy package, the party would no doubt benefit.<\/p>\n<p>But the details here aren&#8217;t encouraging for McCain&#8217;s strategy for success. The White House has no strategy for Iraq (and the GOP Congress doesn&#8217;t seem anxious to push them for one too hard) and <i>they just passed<\/i> what they insisted was a comprehensive energy package, which turned out to be a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanprogressaction.org\/site\/apps\/nl\/content2.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&#038;b=699965&#038;ct=1226465\">bad joke<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>And then there&#8217;s &#8220;profligate spending.&#8221; Before the party can move forward on the issue, they&#8217;ll have to decide what in the world that means.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFor example, congressional Republicans passed a $286 billion highway bill and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/5861.html\">refused to scale it back<\/a>. This, they said, was responsible governing. Almost simultaneously, those same Republicans were willing to pass <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbpp.org\/11-17-05bud2.htm\">$50 billion in spending cuts<\/a>, including cuts to food stamps, low-income health care, and child care assistance. This, too, the GOP insisted, was responsible fiscal management.<\/p>\n<p>I mention this because all of the various GOP factions seem to believe that the Republican Party can flourish again if only they can prove to voters that they&#8217;re fiscally responsible and keeping spending &#8220;under control.&#8221; I&#8217;m just not convinced they understand what this means.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;If we really want to do well in 2006, we need to have fiscal discipline like Republicans campaigned on,&#8221; [Graham] said. &#8220;We have lost our way as a party. Our base is deflated and taxpayers don&#8217;t see any difference between us and the Democrats.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Graham, among others, apparently thinks there&#8217;s some great hunger among the electorate for sweeping spending cuts. There isn&#8217;t. Just a couple of months ago, after Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast, Gallup asked Americans about how to address the nation&#8217;s fiscal problems. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/polls\/2005-09-19-poll.htm\">It wasn&#8217;t even close<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>* Cut spending for war in Iraq &#8212; 54%<br \/>\n* Raise taxes &#8212; 17%<br \/>\n* Increase federal budget deficit &#8212; 15%<br \/>\n* Cut spending for domestic programs &#8212; 6%<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Graham and McCain are right that their party is in trouble, but if they&#8217;re convinced they can appeal to voters on a &#8220;we&#8217;ll slash spending&#8221; platform, they&#8217;re likely to be very disappointed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) did some appearances together in South Carolina yesterday, and were about half right about their party&#8217;s troubles. With the war in Iraq, higher energy costs and breakneck government spending, the GOP faces a tough round of congressional elections in 2006 unless things change, two key Republican senators [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5903","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5903"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5903\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}