{"id":6053,"date":"2005-12-12T09:11:56","date_gmt":"2005-12-12T14:11:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6053"},"modified":"2005-12-12T09:11:56","modified_gmt":"2005-12-12T14:11:56","slug":"the-quintessential-bush-approach-to-unwelcome-advice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-quintessential-bush-approach-to-unwelcome-advice\/","title":{"rendered":"The quintessential Bush approach to unwelcome advice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The internal conflict between career Justice Department attorneys in the Civil Rights Division and Bush&#8217;s political appointees has been getting considerably worse the past few months. When career attorneys reviewed Georgia&#8217;s poll-tax law and found that it was discriminatory against minority voters. Bush-appointed higher-ups <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/11\/16\/AR2005111602504.html\">quickly overruled them<\/a>. Similarly, attorneys in the Civil Rights Division concluded unanimously that Tom DeLay&#8217;s re-redistricting scheme in Texas violated the Voting Rights Act. Again, Bush&#8217;s political appointees <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/12\/01\/AR2005120101927.html\">intervened and overruled<\/a> the staff attorneys.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly, the intra-agency struggle wasn&#8217;t going to fade away. Career attorneys in the Civil Rights Division feel like they&#8217;ve been ignored, the law is being manipulated for partisan ends, and they&#8217;re leaking to the media in retaliation. So, what&#8217;s to be done? Perhaps a new policy that would de-politicize the review process? Don&#8217;t be silly. Instead there&#8217;s a new policy that simply <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/12\/09\/AR2005120901894.html\">won&#8217;t allow<\/a> attorneys in the Civil Rights Division to make recommendations in voting-rights cases anymore.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Justice Department has barred staff attorneys from offering recommendations in major Voting Rights Act cases, marking a significant change in the procedures meant to insulate such decisions from politics, congressional aides and current and former employees familiar with the issue said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The attorneys will still be able to cases to see if they conflict with the Voting Rights Act; they just won&#8217;t be able to tell Justice Department higher-ups what their legal research concludes. Not surprisingly, the attorneys <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dallasnews.com\/sharedcontent\/dws\/news\/washington\/stories\/DN-civilrights_09nat.ART.North.Edition2.1d9351f5.html\">recognize why<\/a> the policy has changed.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity citing fear of reprisal, said lawyers who assess the state submissions &#8212; known as requests for pre-clearance &#8212; have been told to send their analysis memos to political higher-ups minus the recommendations that have historically been part of the decision-making process.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They are supposed to present all sides and not even give an inkling as to where the evidence is leading them,&#8221; said a former Civil Rights Division attorney. &#8220;Clearly it was done &#8212; I don&#8217;t think there is any question about this \u2013 so that there would be no paper trail.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s a classic example of governing in the Bush years. When experts in civil-rights law make politically-inconvenient recommendations, the appropriate response is stop them from making the recommendations in the first place.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The internal conflict between career Justice Department attorneys in the Civil Rights Division and Bush&#8217;s political appointees has been getting considerably worse the past few months. When career attorneys reviewed Georgia&#8217;s poll-tax law and found that it was discriminatory against minority voters. Bush-appointed higher-ups quickly overruled them. Similarly, attorneys in the Civil Rights Division concluded [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6053"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6053\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}