{"id":6180,"date":"2005-12-26T10:46:33","date_gmt":"2005-12-26T15:46:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6180"},"modified":"2005-12-26T10:46:33","modified_gmt":"2005-12-26T15:46:33","slug":"itll-make-for-some-interesting-hearings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/itll-make-for-some-interesting-hearings\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;ll make for some interesting hearings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>That there will be Senate hearings to investigate Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program is no longer an issue. Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) has made hearings a high priority, and, in addition to Senate Dems, several Senate Republicans <a href=\"http:\/\/www.realcities.com\/mld\/krwashington\/news\/nation\/13451356.htm\">have echoed<\/a> the significance of a formal inquiry.<\/p>\n<p>But following up on the <a href=\"http:\/\/nytimes.com\/2005\/12\/24\/politics\/24spy.html?ei=5094&#038;en=7e76956223502390&#038;hp=&#038;ex=1135486800&#038;adxnnl=1&#038;partner=homepage&#038;adxnnlx=1135430777-vSxpGR3SIRXYWFtX9FMJlg&#038;pagewanted=all\">latest revelations<\/a> about the administration&#8217;s program, the next area for consideration is just how interesting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2005\/12\/25\/politics\/25wiretap.html\">the hearings will be<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Congressional officials said Saturday that they wanted to investigate the disclosure that the National Security Agency had gained access to some of the country&#8217;s main telephone arteries to glean data on possible terrorists.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As far as Congressional investigations are concerned,&#8221; said Senator Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, &#8220;these new revelations can only multiply and intensify the growing list of questions and concerns about the warrantless surveillance of Americans.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Members of the Judiciary Committee have already indicated that they intend to conduct oversight hearings into the president&#8217;s legal authority to order domestic eavesdropping on terrorist suspects without a warrant.<\/p>\n<p>But Congressional officials said Saturday that they would probably seek to expand the review to include the disclosure that the security agency, using its access to giant phone &#8220;switches,&#8221; had also traced and analyzed phone and Internet traffic in much larger volumes than what the Bush administration had acknowledged.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>One Republican congressional aide added, &#8220;We want to look at the entire program, an in-depth review, and this new data-mining issue is certainly a part of the whole picture.&#8221; Sounds like it could be a pretty thorough review.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how Senate Republicans, who have not yet had to deal with contentious hearings involving a White House controversy, approach these hearings, especially if the investigation generates significant media attention, which seems pretty likely. Do they carry Bush&#8217;s water, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hillnews.com\/thehill\/export\/TheHill\/News\/Frontpage\/122005\/patriot.html\">some have already begun to do<\/a>, or do they exercise due diligence in front of the cameras?<\/p>\n<p>Atrios recently <a href=\"http:\/\/atrios.blogspot.com\/2005_12_11_atrios_archive.html#113470952587270826\">suggested<\/a> the warrantless-spying story will be &#8220;the test&#8221; for the right. It seems particularly true for Republicans on the Hill.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>That there will be Senate hearings to investigate Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program is no longer an issue. Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) has made hearings a high priority, and, in addition to Senate Dems, several Senate Republicans have echoed the significance of a formal inquiry. But following up on the latest revelations about the administration&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6180"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6180\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}