{"id":6198,"date":"2005-12-28T15:34:12","date_gmt":"2005-12-28T20:34:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6198"},"modified":"2005-12-28T15:34:12","modified_gmt":"2005-12-28T20:34:12","slug":"helping-shape-the-wrong-frame","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/helping-shape-the-wrong-frame\/","title":{"rendered":"Helping shape the wrong frame"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When it comes to the debate surrounding Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program, most Dems, and a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/6145.html\">surprising number of Republicans<\/a>, have been pretty vocal about their concerns that the president exceeded his authority. It&#8217;s interesting, though, to consider <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washtimes.com\/national\/20051228-122207-1549r.htm\">why some Dems are hesitant<\/a> to criticize Bush on this.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;I get nervous when I see the Democrats playing this [civil liberties] issue out too far. They had better be careful about the politics of it,&#8221; said [Michael O&#8217;Hanlon, a national-security analyst at the Brookings Institution who advises Democrats on defense issues], who says the Patriot Act is &#8220;good legislation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These Democrats say attacks on anti-terrorist intelligence programs will deepen mistrust of their ability to protect the nation&#8217;s security, a weakness that led in part to the defeat of Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee, last year.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Republicans still hold the advantage on every national-security issue we tested,&#8221; said Mark Penn, a Democratic pollster and former adviser to President Clinton, who co-authored a Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) memo on the party&#8217;s national-security weaknesses.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Marshall Wittmann <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bullmooseblog.com\/2005\/12\/big-brother-w.html\">expressed similar concerns<\/a> last week when he argued, &#8220;[T]he donkey is effectively &#8220;rebranding&#8217; and &#8216;framing&#8217; itself as weak on national security.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>First, I&#8217;m not at all convinced Dems are focusing excessively on civil liberties as the principal problem with the White House&#8217;s conduct. Most of the criticisms seem to emphasize the rule of law, the constitutional process, and Bush circumventing the judiciary while ignoring the separation of powers. There&#8217;s a civil liberties angle to these concerns, but the criticisms have gone considerably further than ACLU talking points.<\/p>\n<p>Second, to follow up on a point I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/6138.html\">raised<\/a> last week, there&#8217;s no reason for Dems to help the right frame the debate in a way that helps the administration downplay its significance. If the controversy boils down to &#8220;Bush wants to spy on bad guys and Dems aren&#8217;t happy about it,&#8221; it&#8217;s a phony debate that skirts the real issues. However, if it&#8217;s &#8220;We need to eavesdrop in order to protect the country&#8221; vs. &#8220;Go right ahead, just follow the law and allow for some checks and balances,&#8221; it&#8217;s at least a fair fight based on the facts.<\/p>\n<p>The administration and its allies would prefer that all criticism of the warrantless-search program be dismissed as petty ideological squabbling over civil liberties. Why any Dem would want to help in that endeavor is beyond my understanding.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When it comes to the debate surrounding Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program, most Dems, and a surprising number of Republicans, have been pretty vocal about their concerns that the president exceeded his authority. It&#8217;s interesting, though, to consider why some Dems are hesitant to criticize Bush on this. &#8220;I get nervous when I see the Democrats playing [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6198","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6198","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6198"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6198\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6198"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6198"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6198"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}