{"id":6252,"date":"2006-01-05T09:42:50","date_gmt":"2006-01-05T14:42:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6252"},"modified":"2006-01-05T09:42:50","modified_gmt":"2006-01-05T14:42:50","slug":"harman-isnt-impressed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/harman-isnt-impressed\/","title":{"rendered":"Harman isn&#8217;t impressed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last week or so, many supporters of the administration have pointed to Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, as a defender of Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program. It&#8217;s a notion that has, unfortunately, been picked up by a variety of news outlets, including <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200512220014\">Fox News<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200512230007\">CBS<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/magazine\/article\/0,9171,1145222,00.html\">Time<\/a> &#8212; despite the fact that her comments had been <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200601040001\">taken out of context<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But in case there was any doubt about what, exactly, Rep. Harman thinks of Bush&#8217;s tactics, she made her perspective <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/wireStory?id=1471644\">quite clear<\/a> yesterday.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee told President Bush Wednesday that the White House broke the law by withholding information from the full congressional oversight committees about a new domestic surveillance program.<\/p>\n<p>In a letter to Bush, Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., said the National Security Act requires the heads of the various intelligence agencies to keep the entire House and Senate intelligence committees &#8220;fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Only in the case of a highly classified covert action can the president choose to inform a narrower group of Congress members about his decision, Harman said. That action is defined in the law as an operation to influence political, economic or military conditions of another country.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The NSA program does not qualify as a &#8216;covert action,'&#8221; Harman wrote.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In response, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino told reporters, &#8220;We believe that Congress was briefed appropriately.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>To a real extent, this is a secondary issue. The administration needed judicial oversight and decided not to bother; whether officials &#8220;briefed&#8221; a handful of lawmakers or not won&#8217;t change the fact that the president circumvented the legal process.<\/p>\n<p>But as long as we appear to be going down this road, and because this will come up during the inevitable hearings, let&#8217;s not forget that the briefings some lawmakers received were a joke, featuring <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2005-12-20-democrats-wiretapping_x.htm\">key omissions<\/a>, unanswered questions, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/12\/19\/AR2005121901641.html\">no recourse<\/a> for those who felt the tactics were illegal.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, Harman isn&#8217;t a bomb-thrower and the fact that she believes the White House broke the law keeps the heat on in a big way.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last week or so, many supporters of the administration have pointed to Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, as a defender of Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program. It&#8217;s a notion that has, unfortunately, been picked up by a variety of news outlets, including Fox News, CBS, and Time &#8212; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6252","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6252"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6252\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6252"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6252"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}