{"id":6279,"date":"2006-01-08T09:11:02","date_gmt":"2006-01-08T14:11:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6279"},"modified":"2006-01-08T09:11:02","modified_gmt":"2006-01-08T14:11:02","slug":"now-this-is-a-helpful-poll","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/now-this-is-a-helpful-poll\/","title":{"rendered":"Now <i>this<\/i> is a helpful poll"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Dec. 28, Rasmussen Reports released <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rasmussenreports.com\/2005\/NSA.htm\">a poll<\/a> on the controversy of the day: Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program. It was, unfortunately, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/6201.html\">largely useless<\/a>, since it failed to ask respondents about the most controversial aspects of the domestic spying program.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, that didn&#8217;t stop the White House and its allies from touting the poll as proof of American support for Bush&#8217;s conduct. Just last week, Scott McClellan, who claims to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/6239.html\">reject polls<\/a> in general, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2006\/01\/20060103-1.html\">bragged<\/a> about the results of the Rasmussen poll, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2006\/01\/20060104-1.html\">twice<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>To its credit, a new <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/wireStory?id=1483269\">Associated Press-Ipsos poll<\/a> addressed the controversy directly. The White House probably won&#8217;t be touting this one.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A majority of Americans want the Bush administration to get court approval before eavesdropping on people inside the United States, even if those calls might involve suspected terrorists, an AP-Ipsos poll shows.<\/p>\n<p>Over the past three weeks, President Bush and top aides have defended the electronic monitoring program they secretly launched shortly after Sept. 11, 2001, as a vital tool to protect the nation from al-Qaida and its affiliates.<\/p>\n<p>Yet 56 percent of respondents in an AP-Ipsos poll said the government should be required to first get a court warrant to eavesdrop on the overseas calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens when those communications are believed to be tied to terrorism.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>One disappointing result was the partisan breakdown. About three-fourths of Democrats want the president to get a warrant, but and two-thirds of Republicans don&#8217;t. There&#8217;s no reason for this. One of the GOP&#8217;s guiding principles is supposed to be limited government.<\/p>\n<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, the AP did follow-up interviews with many respondents, some of whom seemed to appreciate the issue at hand.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But Peter Ahr of Caldwell, N.J., a religious studies professor at Seton Hall University, said he could not find a justification for skipping judicial approvals. Nor did he believe the administration&#8217;s argument that such a step would impair terrorism investigations.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re a nation of laws. &#8230; That means that everybody has to live by the law, including the administration,&#8221; said Ahr, 64, a Democrat who argues for checks and balances. &#8220;For the administration to simply go after wiretaps on their own without anyone else&#8217;s say-so is a violation of that principle.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Apparently, that sentiment is now held by the majority.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Dec. 28, Rasmussen Reports released a poll on the controversy of the day: Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program. It was, unfortunately, largely useless, since it failed to ask respondents about the most controversial aspects of the domestic spying program. Of course, that didn&#8217;t stop the White House and its allies from touting the poll as proof [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6279"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6279\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}