{"id":6548,"date":"2006-02-07T09:12:28","date_gmt":"2006-02-07T14:12:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6548"},"modified":"2006-02-07T09:12:28","modified_gmt":"2006-02-07T14:12:28","slug":"counting-on-forgetful-terrorists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/counting-on-forgetful-terrorists\/","title":{"rendered":"Counting on forgetful terrorists"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>To hear Alberto Gonzales tell it yesterday, the fact that we&#8217;re even talking about warrantless domestic searches is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/02\/06\/AR2006020600931.html\">literally dangerous<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our enemy is listening. And I cannot help but wonder if they aren&#8217;t shaking their heads in amazement at the thought that anyone would imperil such a sensitive program by leaking its existence in the first place, and smiling at the prospect that we might now disclose even more or perhaps even unilaterally disarm ourselves of a key tool in the war on terror.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It was an odd sentiment on a number of levels. No one&#8217;s talking about &#8220;unilateral disarmament&#8221;; we&#8217;re talking about legal surveillance with checks and balances. But more importantly, Gonzales said the program is so important that &#8220;leaking its existence in the first place&#8221; is, apparently, a huge victory for terrorists. Fortunately, Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) thought to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/02\/06\/AR2006020601359.html\">follow up on this point<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Biden: General, how has this revelation damaged the program? I&#8217;m almost confused by it but, I mean, it seems to presuppose that these very sophisticated Al Qaida folks didn&#8217;t think we were intercepting their phone calls. I mean, I&#8217;m a little confused. How did it damage this?<\/p>\n<p>Gonzales: Well, Senator, I would first refer to the experts in the Intel Committee who are making that statement, first of all. I&#8217;m just the lawyer. And so, when the director of the CIA says this should really damage our intel capabilities, I would defer to that statement. I think, based on my experience, it is true &#8212; you would assume that the enemy is presuming that we are engaged in some kind of surveillance.<\/p>\n<p>But if they&#8217;re not reminded about it all the time in the newspapers and in stories, they sometimes forget.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The comment generated laughter in the Judiciary Committee hearing room, and has been joked about throughout the &#8216;sphere, but it&#8217;s nevertheless a startling admission.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nSince this story broke in December, the administration and its allies have insisted repeatedly that the revelations are so dramatic, it&#8217;s literally undermined the war on terror. Indeed, we should, they say, prosecute whisteblowers who dared to expose Bush&#8217;s circumvention of the law.<\/p>\n<p>Gonzales may not have intended to be so helpful, but he nevertheless ripped the mask of this charade in his comments yesterday &#8212; to believe the news about warrantless-searches is dangerous is to believe that terrorists might &#8220;forget&#8221; that we&#8217;re watching them. And with that, another talking point bites the dust.<\/p>\n<p>Or, as Biden told Gonzales yesterday, &#8220;Well, I hope you and my distinguished friend from Alabama are right, that they&#8217;re that stupid and naive because we&#8217;re much better off if that&#8217;s the case. I get the impression from the work I&#8217;ve done in this area that they&#8217;re pretty darn sophisticated; they pretty well know.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>To hear Alberto Gonzales tell it yesterday, the fact that we&#8217;re even talking about warrantless domestic searches is literally dangerous. &#8220;Our enemy is listening. And I cannot help but wonder if they aren&#8217;t shaking their heads in amazement at the thought that anyone would imperil such a sensitive program by leaking its existence in the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6548","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6548"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6548\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}