{"id":6579,"date":"2006-02-09T14:47:30","date_gmt":"2006-02-09T19:47:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6579"},"modified":"2006-02-09T14:47:30","modified_gmt":"2006-02-09T19:47:30","slug":"about-that-disrupted-attack","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/about-that-disrupted-attack\/","title":{"rendered":"About that disrupted attack&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Before we get into the big news story of the day &#8212; Bush&#8217;s comments today about a thwarted terrorist attack in Los Angeles in 2002 &#8212; let&#8217;s consider a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2006\/02\/20060209-2.html\">brief step back<\/a> to last October.<\/p>\n<p>About four months ago, the president claimed, for the first time, that his administration had disrupted &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/06\/AR2005100600455.html\">at least ten serious al Qaeda terrorist plots<\/a> since September the 11th [2001], including three al Qaeda plots to attack inside the United States.&#8221; As it turned out, some of the &#8220;serious plots&#8221; were actually <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/22\/AR2005102201162.html\">half-baked plans<\/a> that were never going to happen. Regardless, in an Oct. 6 speech, Bush specifically pointed to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2005\/10\/06\/AR2005100600455.html\">thwarted attack on the Library Tower<\/a> in Los Angeles from Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks.<\/p>\n<p>Fast forward to today. In one of the infamous &#8220;major speeches&#8221; on the war on terror, Bush pointed to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2006\/POLITICS\/02\/09\/bush.terror.ap\/index.html\">a thwarted attack on the Library Tower<\/a> in Los Angeles from Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks. To be fair, Bush <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2006\/02\/20060209-2.html\">included<\/a> a couple of new details &#8212; shoe-bombs were apparently part of the plot &#8212; but the president essentially made major headlines today for repeating a four-month-old claim.<\/p>\n<p>Does this have something to do with the warrantless-search program? <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20060209\/ap_on_go_pr_wh\/bush_13\">Apparently not<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>So, why is this a major story today? The Washington Post&#8217;s Dan Froomkin thinks the White House has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/blog\/2006\/02\/09\/BL2006020901085_pf.html\">pulled another fast one<\/a> on the press corps. I think he&#8217;s right.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>White House spokesman Scott McClellan whipped up the press corps early this morning with word that Bush would offer hitherto secret information about the plot to crash a plane into Los Angeles&#8217;s tallest building.<\/p>\n<p>Reporters were abuzz, and CNN even pulled away from its live coverage of a news conference announcing murder charges for a British man whose American wife and baby were shot to death last month in Massachusetts.<\/p>\n<p>But now we&#8217;re all left scratching our heads a bit. Why is the White House suddenly offering all these details, even though they are unrelated to the central issue preoccupying official Washington, namely whether Bush&#8217;s secret surveillance plan is illegal? Could it just be an attempt to change the subject?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I hope that last question was rhetorical because the answer seems so painfully obvious.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Before we get into the big news story of the day &#8212; Bush&#8217;s comments today about a thwarted terrorist attack in Los Angeles in 2002 &#8212; let&#8217;s consider a brief step back to last October. About four months ago, the president claimed, for the first time, that his administration had disrupted &#8220;at least ten serious [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6579","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6579"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6579\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}