{"id":6593,"date":"2006-02-11T10:03:07","date_gmt":"2006-02-11T15:03:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6593"},"modified":"2006-02-11T10:03:07","modified_gmt":"2006-02-11T15:03:07","slug":"the-troops-are-not-political-props","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-troops-are-not-political-props\/","title":{"rendered":"The troops are not political props"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Just a couple of months ago, after a series of political speeches from the president on military bases, there was growing concern among active-duty troops about whether they were being <a href=\"http:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/story\/0,2933,177906,00.html\">dragged into a partisan fight<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The attacks against critics at military settings may have put troops in the awkward position of undermining their own regulations. A Department of Defense directive doesn&#8217;t allow service members in uniform to attend &#8220;partisan political events.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Questions have been raised about the military&#8217;s attendance at events where Bush says something like &#8220;they spoke the truth then, they&#8217;re speaking politics now.&#8221; Several members of the military told FOX News that Bush is inviting the troops to take sides in a partisan debate in his speeches.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is a very bad sign,&#8221; said retired Marine Gen. Joseph Hoar, who led Central Command in the early 1990s and is an administration critic. &#8220;This is the sort of thing that you find in other countries where the military and political, certain political parties are aligned.&#8221; [\u2026]<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Where you have our uniformed members being put in a position where it looks like they&#8217;re rooting for one side or another is very disconcerting,&#8221; said Greg Noone, a former Navy lawyer.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The questions and discomfort hasn&#8217;t stopped the Bush White House from trying to play up a politically-advantageous angle. This week, Robert Novak reported that Raul Damas, associate director of political affairs at the White House, has been &#8220;on the phone directly to Republican county chairmen <a href=\"http:\/\/www.suntimes.com\/output\/novak\/cst-edt-novak09.html\">to arrange local speeches by active duty military personnel<\/a> to talk about their experiences in Iraq.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/robert-schlesinger\/white-house-mobilizes-the_b_15354.html\">Robert Schlesinger suggested<\/a> it&#8217;s not because the White House is interested in hearing more about the troops&#8217; personal experiences.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>According to the DoD regs, examples of prohibited activities by active-duty military include: A &#8220;member on active duty shall not speak before a partisan political gathering, including any gathering that promotes a partisan political party, candidate, or cause.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Without knowing the details of these arrangements it&#8217;s impossible to say whether the letter of the law is being broken here. But the White House &#8212; by extension the commander-in-chief himself (is that unitary government?) &#8212; arranging for active-duty military to speak at GOP events certainly seems like a clear violation of the law&#8217;s spirit. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>[W]hat makes these partisan, politicized events is the fact that they are being organized by (a) the White House&#8217;s political affairs office and (b) local branches of the Republican Party.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dtic.mil\/whs\/directives\/corres\/html2\/d134410x.htm\">Pentagon<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dtic.mil\/whs\/directives\/corres\/html2\/d134410x.htm#ce3\">regulations<\/a> prohibit active-duty military personnel from engaging in partisan political activities. It&#8217;d be far more encouraging if they had a Commander in Chief who didn&#8217;t encourage them to do otherwise.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Just a couple of months ago, after a series of political speeches from the president on military bases, there was growing concern among active-duty troops about whether they were being dragged into a partisan fight. The attacks against critics at military settings may have put troops in the awkward position of undermining their own regulations. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6593","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6593"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6593\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}