{"id":6607,"date":"2006-02-13T14:05:31","date_gmt":"2006-02-13T19:05:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6607"},"modified":"2006-02-13T14:05:31","modified_gmt":"2006-02-13T19:05:31","slug":"a-tax-by-any-other-name","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/a-tax-by-any-other-name\/","title":{"rendered":"A tax by any other name&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If there&#8217;s one thing all political observers know for sure, it&#8217;s that Bush opposes any and all tax increases, right? Well, <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/print?id=1608126\">it depends<\/a> on what the meaning of &#8220;tax&#8221; is.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>President Bush hates new taxes, that&#8217;s for sure. But tell that to airline passengers, higher-income veterans and owners of freighters using the St. Lawrence Seaway. They are among those hit up for billions of dollars under his new budget plan.<\/p>\n<p>The spending proposal for the budget year that begins Oct. 1 contains $3.5 billion in new user fees. Typically branded as new taxes by those who have to pay them, these fees are intended to hold down the public&#8217;s cost for programs such as airline screening, medical care for veterans and military retirees, food inspection and oversight of commodities markets.<\/p>\n<p>The fees would swell to $47.2 billion over five years, dunning taxpayers and industry to help pay for government services.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The White House argues these aren&#8217;t tax increases; they&#8217;re &#8220;user-fee&#8221; increases. What&#8217;s the difference? Well, one sounds more politically palatable.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe I&#8217;m old fashioned, but when the government requires citizens to pay money to the state to finance a government service, it&#8217;s a tax. That&#8217;s actually the <i>definition<\/i> of a tax.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d also add that, by Republican standards, Bush is trying to raise taxes. In 1992, when Bill Clinton was taking on the first President Bush, the Bush-Quayle campaign and the RNC released an alleged list of 128 tax increases Clinton created as governor of Arkansas. The list was <a href=\"http:\/\/www-tech.mit.edu\/V112\/N33\/briefs.33w.html\">painfully ridiculous<\/a> and even included some taxes that were counted multiple times. As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2097656\">Michael Kinsley noted<\/a>, the list even included &#8220;an extension of the dog-racing season, on the logic that a longer season meant more tax revenue.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But more importantly, the Republicans&#8217; list of 128 tax increases also included, you guessed it, any and all fee increases from the state of Arkansas during Clinton&#8217;s tenure. If the state fishing license went up one penny, Republicans insisted that counted as a tax increase. In fact, the smear on Clinton included (#92 out of the 128) a $1-per-conviction court costs fee imposed on convicted criminals. Bush and the RNC insisted that this fee &#8212; $1 on criminals &#8212; was further proof that Clinton was a serial tax-raiser.<\/p>\n<p>And now this President Bush wants to raise &#8220;fees&#8221; on everything from airline tickets to medical care for veterans.<\/p>\n<p>As it turns out, Congress is staunchly opposed to the increases, and Bush&#8217;s proposals have been described as &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/print?id=1608126\">dead on arrival<\/a>.&#8221; But prospects aside, isn&#8217;t it fair to characterize the White House budget as full of &#8220;tax increases&#8221;?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If there&#8217;s one thing all political observers know for sure, it&#8217;s that Bush opposes any and all tax increases, right? Well, it depends on what the meaning of &#8220;tax&#8221; is. President Bush hates new taxes, that&#8217;s for sure. But tell that to airline passengers, higher-income veterans and owners of freighters using the St. Lawrence Seaway. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6607\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}