{"id":6685,"date":"2006-02-22T15:11:47","date_gmt":"2006-02-22T20:11:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6685"},"modified":"2006-02-22T15:11:47","modified_gmt":"2006-02-22T20:11:47","slug":"bush-is-a-victim-of-his-own-rhetoric","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bush-is-a-victim-of-his-own-rhetoric\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Bush is a victim of his own rhetoric&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Reuters&#8217; Alan Elsner <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/wireStory?id=1649640\">raises a provocative point<\/a> today about the port controversy that I haven&#8217;t seen elsewhere. Elsner seems to be an agnostic on whether the deal is worthwhile, but argues that the White House shouldn&#8217;t be surprised by the fear-based reaction the port deal has received &#8212; the Bush gang has been tilling this soil for a while.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Bush has long been successful in persuading Americans they were under constant threat and he was the best man to protect them&#8230;. Fears have not subsided, pollster John Zogby said, although the United States has not suffered a major attack since September 11, 2001. Bush two weeks ago revealed a plot foiled in 2002 to fly an airplane into the West Coast&#8217;s tallest building and said the terrorist threat had not abated.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s what makes this story so ironic. I guess you can&#8217;t have it both ways,&#8221; Zogby said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University, said, &#8220;Bush is a victim of his own rhetoric. This deal flies in the face of the Bush administration&#8217;s general posture, which has been that there is much to fear out there and they have been vigilant in protecting the country.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Well, maybe. To be sure, there are some key nuances at play. The White House has played on national fear for partisan purposes on too many instances &#8212; Scott McClellan still cynically uses 9\/11 as a way to get out of uncomfortable jams &#8212; but the Bush gang has never specifically said Americans should be afraid of the United Arab Emirates.<\/p>\n<p>Elsner&#8217;s point seems to be that the White House has stoked the fires of fear too broadly, and the argument is not without merit. Before 9\/11, a limited port deal with a UAE company that operates many ports around the world wouldn&#8217;t have even generated wire copy. But the Bush gang has gone out of its way to convince the nation that the Middle East is a dangerous place. The region&#8217;s lack of democracies, the president says, make it a breeding ground for terrorism.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, Americans are hearing &#8212; from the entire Republican congressional leadership, no less &#8212; that the UAE recognized the Taliban&#8217;s government and was used by the 9\/11 terrorists <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/02\/21\/AR2006022100722.html\">as an operational and financial hub<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In a country that Bush has conditioned to be afraid, the White House shouldn&#8217;t be surprised by the reaction this is receiving. Is this to say all of the criticism of the port deal is fair? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonmonthly.com\/archives\/individual\/2006_02\/008275.php\">Probably not<\/a>. But the phrase &#8220;you reap what you sow&#8221; keeps coming to mind.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reuters&#8217; Alan Elsner raises a provocative point today about the port controversy that I haven&#8217;t seen elsewhere. Elsner seems to be an agnostic on whether the deal is worthwhile, but argues that the White House shouldn&#8217;t be surprised by the fear-based reaction the port deal has received &#8212; the Bush gang has been tilling this [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6685","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6685","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6685"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6685\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}