{"id":6704,"date":"2006-02-24T13:00:32","date_gmt":"2006-02-24T18:00:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6704"},"modified":"2006-02-24T13:00:32","modified_gmt":"2006-02-24T18:00:32","slug":"debating-abortion-through-choice-of-words","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/debating-abortion-through-choice-of-words\/","title":{"rendered":"Debating abortion through choice of words"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Particularly over the last week or so, there have been several national news stories about abortion, spurred by the Supreme Court&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/02\/21\/AR2006022100582.html\">announcement<\/a> on Monday and the South Dakota legislature&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/02\/22\/national\/22dakota.html?ex=1298264400&#038;en=88da6ef44e83017e&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">activities<\/a> all week. AlterNet&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alternet.org\/blogs\/echochamber\/32691\/\">Deanna Zandt makes a good case<\/a> that, at least as far as the politics goes, choice of words matter.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s been frustrating for many of us to see a number of progressive folks referring to the type of abortion the ban deals with using a certain phrase that won&#8217;t be repeated here. Why? Lesson #1 in sociolinguistics: using the term reinforces the frame. Sure, that&#8217;s what the Republicans named their law, but it is grotesquely misleading and skews the debate away from what this ban is about: human rights, and more specifically, reproductive rights.<\/p>\n<p>A slightly better alternative to the conservative, misogynist frame that has been used by some is &#8220;late-term abortion.&#8221; Amie Newman noted in The Mix yesterday that this is also misleading, since &#8220;late&#8221; could also mean a blanket ban on whatever the speaker defines as &#8220;late.&#8221; Too much gray area here: &#8220;late&#8221; could mean anything after the first trimester, for example.<\/p>\n<p>Others have suggested that progressives should refer to the actual medical procedure that conservatives are seeking to ban &#8212; without provisions accounting for a woman&#8217;s health, which is often the only circumstance under which this procedure is performed &#8212; called dilation and extraction, or D&#038;X. My own opinion lies here, since referring to the acronym would free up linguistic context for talking about the woman&#8217;s rights. However, a quick informal poll among friends showed me a few wrinkled noses at the word &#8220;extraction,&#8221; some saying that it conjured up something just as gruesome as the forced-birth side&#8217;s frame.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think Deanna is largely right here, but her column is open ended. A handful of conservative members of Congress and some far-right allies came up with the phrase &#8220;partial-birth abortion&#8221; because they saw political benefits to it. It&#8217;s not a medical term; it&#8217;s propoganda. Now, the phrase is ubiquitous, though most reporters at least use qualifiers such as &#8220;a procedure opponents refer to as&#8230;&#8221; or &#8220;so-called&#8221; in their news accounts.<\/p>\n<p>The problem, as Deanna touched on, is that abortion-rights advocates don&#8217;t have poll-tested phrases of our own when it comes to this controversy. Anyone have any ideas?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Particularly over the last week or so, there have been several national news stories about abortion, spurred by the Supreme Court&#8217;s announcement on Monday and the South Dakota legislature&#8217;s activities all week. AlterNet&#8217;s Deanna Zandt makes a good case that, at least as far as the politics goes, choice of words matter. It&#8217;s been frustrating [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6704\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}