{"id":6800,"date":"2006-03-08T10:29:44","date_gmt":"2006-03-08T15:29:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=6800"},"modified":"2006-03-08T10:29:44","modified_gmt":"2006-03-08T15:29:44","slug":"bushs-angry-critics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bushs-angry-critics\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush&#8217;s &#8216;angry&#8217; critics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The White House has latched onto a meme that Republicans seem particularly fond of: the president&#8217;s critics are &#8220;angry.&#8221; Bush is the optimistic visionary, the argument goes, while his political opponents are wild-eyed cynics, fueled by hate, who use over-the-top rhetoric.<\/p>\n<p>The notion that Bush&#8217;s detractors are bitter is not without merit. And, sure, the rhetoric can get a little heated. Just yesterday, for example, a couple of the president&#8217;s critics appeared at an event in DC and blasted Bush &#8220;unconscionable,&#8221; &#8220;irresponsible,&#8221; &#8220;vindictive,&#8221; and &#8220;inept.&#8221; Another described the White House as &#8220;pathetic&#8221; and said Bush &#8220;is not a responsible human being; he is a phenomenally reckless human being.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>When the RNC&#8217;s Ken Mehlman blasts liberals for their heated denunciations, this is exactly the kind of thing he&#8217;s talking about. Of course, these comments didn&#8217;t come from liberals &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/03\/07\/AR2006030701403.html\">they came from conservatives<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If the ancient political wisdom is correct that a charge unanswered is a charge agreed to, the Bush White House pleaded guilty yesterday at the Cato Institute to some extraordinary allegations.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We did ask a few members of the Bush economic team to come,&#8221; explained David Boaz, the think tank&#8217;s executive vice president, as he moderated a discussion between two prominent conservatives about President Bush. &#8220;We didn&#8217;t get that.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Why didn&#8217;t anyone from the Bush gang accept the invitation? Because the two speakers were conservative opponents of the president: former Reagan aide Bruce Bartlett and conservative blogger Andrew Sullivan, the latter of which accused Bush of betraying &#8220;almost every principle conservatism has ever stood for.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s entertaining, of course, to hear two conservatives use surprisingly strong language to condemn Bush and practically everything about his presidency, but it&#8217;s worth noting that Bartlett and Sullivan are not exactly switching sides here. They&#8217;re blasting the White House for not being conservative <i>enough<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Still, Cato had a standing-room-only crowd listen to these two rebuke Bush. And there was nary a voice of opposition to the conclusions Bartlett and Sullivan drew. There was one gem that should cause some heartburn in Karl Rove&#8217;s office.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;If Bush were running today against Bill Clinton, I&#8217;d vote for Clinton,&#8221; Bartlett served.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think it&#8217;s safe to say Bush has a problem with the small-government crowd.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The White House has latched onto a meme that Republicans seem particularly fond of: the president&#8217;s critics are &#8220;angry.&#8221; Bush is the optimistic visionary, the argument goes, while his political opponents are wild-eyed cynics, fueled by hate, who use over-the-top rhetoric. The notion that Bush&#8217;s detractors are bitter is not without merit. And, sure, the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6800"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6800\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}