{"id":7174,"date":"2006-04-18T15:09:04","date_gmt":"2006-04-18T19:09:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=7174"},"modified":"2006-04-18T15:09:04","modified_gmt":"2006-04-18T19:09:04","slug":"bennett-wants-nyt-pulitzer-winners-behind-bars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bennett-wants-nyt-pulitzer-winners-behind-bars\/","title":{"rendered":"Bennett wants NYT Pulitzer winners behind bars"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It came as very little surprise yesterday when the [tag]New York Times[\/tag] <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/04\/17\/AR2006041700743.html\">won a Pulitzer Prize<\/a> for its reporting on Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[tag]James Risen[\/tag] and [tag]Eric Lichtblau[\/tag] of the New York Times won the national reporting prize for their articles on the administration&#8217;s domestic [tag]surveillance[\/tag] program, and the Times drew criticism from the left for holding the report for a year. Bush met with Executive Editor Bill Keller and Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr. to argue against publication.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The paper did a courageous thing in printing the story,&#8221; Lichtblau said, adding that the revelation itself &#8220;drowned out the early questions about what the paper did or didn&#8217;t do.&#8221; He added: &#8220;This was by far the toughest story I&#8217;ve ever worked on. It involved sources who obviously put themselves in some jeopardy just by talking about the very existence of the program.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The surprise, however, came by way of the <a href=\"http:\/\/glenngreenwald.blogspot.com\/2006\/04\/pulitzer-prize-for-treason.html\">reaction from [tag]Bush[\/tag]&#8217;s political allies<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>That award has set off a new slew of bitter commentary from Bush supporters, including [Bill] [tag]Bennett[\/tag], proclaiming that [tag]Risen[\/tag] and [tag]Lichtblau[\/tag] belong in [tag]prison[\/tag]. On his radio show this morning, the great free press crusader Bennett said: &#8220;I think what they did is worthy of jail.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Powerline, as always, helpfully expounds on this definitively American principle of throwing reporters in jail who publish stories which damage the political interests of the Commander-in-Chief during a Time of War. In an item entitled &#8220;Pulitzer Prize for Treason,&#8221; Scott &#8220;Big Trunk&#8221; Johnson says that Risen and Lichtblau won the Pulitzer &#8220;for their treasonous contribution to the undermining of the highly classified National Security Agency surveillance program of al Qaeda-related terrorists,&#8221; which &#8212; according to Johnson, &#8220;is a particularly serious crime insofar as it lends assistance to the enemy&#8221; &#8212; all together, now &#8212; &#8220;in a time of war.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Look, I realize that the story is a dreadful embarrassment for the Bush [tag]White House[\/tag]. The president was caught circumventing the law and arguing that he can do literally anything under the guise of national security. The NYT&#8217;s reporting on this exposed an extra-constitutional scheme that involved spying on Americans without oversight, a [tag]warrant[\/tag], or any checks and balances.<\/p>\n<p>But to call these reports treason isn&#8217;t just wrong; it&#8217;s silly.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nGlenn Greenwald helpfully <a href=\"http:\/\/glenngreenwald.blogspot.com\/2006\/04\/pulitzer-prize-for-treason.html#c114538037589424131\">included an audio clip<\/a> from Bennett&#8217;s radio show. The self-proclaimed virtue czar said Risen and Lichtblau:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>took classified information, secret information, published it in their newspapers, <i>against the wishes of the president, against the request of the president<\/i> and others, that they not release it &#8211; they not only released it, they publicized it &#8212; they put it on the front page, and it damaged us, it hurt us.<\/p>\n<p>How do we know it damaged us? Well, it revealed the existence of the surveillance program &#8212; so people are going to stop making calls &#8212; since they are now aware of this &#8212; they&#8217;re going to adjust their behavior&#8230;.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Funny, I was under the impression that we&#8217;d already had this debate back in January &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/02\/06\/AR2006020601359.html\">and Bush&#8217;s allies lost<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Biden: General, how has this revelation damaged the program? I&#8217;m almost confused by it but, I mean, it seems to presuppose that these very sophisticated Al Qaida folks didn&#8217;t think we were intercepting their phone calls. I mean, I&#8217;m a little confused. How did it damage this?<\/p>\n<p>Gonzales: Well, Senator, I would first refer to the experts in the Intel Committee who are making that statement, first of all. I&#8217;m just the lawyer. And so, when the director of the CIA says this should really damage our intel capabilities, I would defer to that statement. I think, based on my experience, it is true &#8212; you would assume that the enemy is presuming that we are engaged in some kind of surveillance.<\/p>\n<p>But if they&#8217;re not reminded about it all the time in the newspapers and in stories, they sometimes forget.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Bennett&#8217;s argument boils down to his belief that the New York Times shouldn&#8217;t run an article if the president asks the paper not to, and if journalists with a scoop disagree, they should be incarcerated. Amazing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It came as very little surprise yesterday when the [tag]New York Times[\/tag] won a Pulitzer Prize for its reporting on Bush&#8217;s warrantless-search program. [tag]James Risen[\/tag] and [tag]Eric Lichtblau[\/tag] of the New York Times won the national reporting prize for their articles on the administration&#8217;s domestic [tag]surveillance[\/tag] program, and the Times drew criticism from the left [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7174"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7174\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}