{"id":7200,"date":"2006-04-21T10:40:22","date_gmt":"2006-04-21T14:40:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=7200"},"modified":"2006-04-21T10:40:22","modified_gmt":"2006-04-21T14:40:22","slug":"bushs-war-on-science-continues-this-time-on-marijuana-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/bushs-war-on-science-continues-this-time-on-marijuana-research\/","title":{"rendered":"Bush&#8217;s war on science continues &#8212; this time on marijuana research"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/04\/21\/health\/21marijuana.html?ex=1303272000&#038;en=2e85da2152771be7&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">This story<\/a> from the New York Times is a terrific case study on why the [tag]Bush administration[\/tag]&#8217;s approach to [tag]science[\/tag] and academic [tag]research[\/tag] is so painful. As the article explains, a panel of &#8220;highly regarded scientists&#8221; conducted thorough research on using [tag]marijuana[\/tag] in some [tag]medical[\/tag] [tag]treatment[\/tag]s and found that the drug can benefit certain patients. Yesterday, Bush&#8217;s FDA <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/04\/21\/health\/21marijuana.html?ex=1303272000&#038;en=2e85da2152771be7&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">ignored those results<\/a> and said that &#8220;no sound scientific studies&#8221; supported the medical use of marijuana<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Food and Drug Administration statement directly contradicts a 1999 review by the Institute of Medicine, a part of the National Academy of Sciences, the nation&#8217;s most prestigious scientific advisory agency. That review found marijuana to be &#8220;moderately well suited for particular conditions, such as chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and AIDS wasting.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Dr. John Benson, co-chairman of the Institute of Medicine committee that examined the research into marijuana&#8217;s effects, said in an interview that the statement on Thursday and the combined review by other agencies were wrong.<\/p>\n<p>The federal government &#8220;loves to ignore our report,&#8221; said Dr. Benson, a professor of internal medicine at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. &#8220;They would rather it never happened.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Some scientists and legislators said the agency&#8217;s statement about marijuana demonstrated that politics had trumped science. &#8220;Unfortunately, this is yet another example of the F.D.A. making pronouncements that seem to be driven more by ideology than by science,&#8221; said Dr. Jerry Avorn, a medical professor at Harvard Medical School.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Bush administration officials? Manipulating science for [tag]political[\/tag] purposes? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucsusa.org\/news\/press_release\/preeminent-scientists-protest-bush-administrations-misuse-of-science.html\">You don&#8217;t say<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The NYT article also noted that the [tag]FDA[\/tag] insisted that marijuana treatments were subjected to &#8220;rigorous scientific scrutiny,&#8221; but scientists who specialize in this research have found that the FDA has discouraged studies, blocked funding, approved poor-quality marijuana for FDA-backed research, and rejected legitimate applications to pursue the science in earnest.<\/p>\n<p>A professor in the division of plant and soil sciences at the University of Massachusetts explained, &#8220;The reason there&#8217;s no good evidence is that they don&#8217;t want an honest trial.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This story from the New York Times is a terrific case study on why the [tag]Bush administration[\/tag]&#8217;s approach to [tag]science[\/tag] and academic [tag]research[\/tag] is so painful. As the article explains, a panel of &#8220;highly regarded scientists&#8221; conducted thorough research on using [tag]marijuana[\/tag] in some [tag]medical[\/tag] [tag]treatment[\/tag]s and found that the drug can benefit certain patients. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7200","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7200","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7200"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7200\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7200"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}