{"id":7216,"date":"2006-04-23T09:12:35","date_gmt":"2006-04-23T13:12:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=7216"},"modified":"2006-04-23T09:12:35","modified_gmt":"2006-04-23T13:12:35","slug":"sunday-discussion-group-46","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/sunday-discussion-group-46\/","title":{"rendered":"Sunday Discussion Group"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Of all the public policy issues debated in this country, [tag]abortion[\/tag] is by far the trickiest. There&#8217;s just not much room for compromise. If you believe a fertilized egg is a full-fledged human being with all the rights therein, abortion is murder. If you don&#8217;t, a government-imposed ban on the procedure takes away a woman&#8217;s civil right and allows the state to regulate the most personal of choices.<\/p>\n<p>The New York Times has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/04\/23\/washington\/23abort.html?ex=1303444800&#038;en=84b9dd6bdda46863&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">a good feature<\/a> today on Democrats&#8217; efforts to walk a fine middle line &#8212; starting in [tag]Pennsylvania[\/tag].<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>As the Democratic Party tries to inch its way toward a new, less polarized politics of abortion, seeking some common ground between supporters and opponents of abortion rights, there is no better case study than the Pennsylvania Senate race.<\/p>\n<p>Many supporters of abortion rights &#8212; sometimes grudgingly, sometimes led more by their minds than by their hearts &#8212; are lining up behind Bob [tag]Casey[\/tag] Jr., a Democratic contender for the Senate who opposes abortion rights. The invitation to a recent Casey event in Philadelphia, raising money for his campaign to unseat Senator Rick [tag]Santorum[\/tag], a Republican, perhaps captured the mood. &#8220;Pragmatic Progressive Women for Casey,&#8221; it declared.<\/p>\n<p>The nine Democratic women in the Senate, including some of the strongest advocates of abortion rights, recently signed a letter of support that struck a similar note, describing Mr. Casey&#8217;s election as &#8220;critical to our efforts of regaining the majority in the U.S. Senate.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Dems have already shown greater tolerance for dissent on this issue than Republicans &#8212; the party did, after all, make Harry Reid the Senate Minority Leader &#8212; but actively going out and recruiting a Dem who opposes abortion rights, in part <i>because<\/i> he opposes abortion rights, was rather unique. And not an altogether welcome development in some pro-choice circles.<\/p>\n<p>Simultaneously, many Senate Dems are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesunion.com\/AspStories\/story.asp?storyID=472621&#038;category=OPINION&#038;newsdate=4\/18\/2006\">pushing<\/a> the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/7066.html\">[tag]Prevention First Act[\/tag]<\/a>, which seeks to reduce abortions by reducing unwanted pregnancies.<\/p>\n<p>Are all of these efforts worthwhile? Can they work as an effective electoral strategy? Will anti-choice voters give Dems another look, or will [tag]pro-choice[\/tag] voters start to stay home? Or both?<\/p>\n<p>If Dems are fundamentally a pro-choice party, do these efforts represent an unwelcome vacillation on a key party principle? Or is this a pragmatic effort to &#8220;expand the tent&#8221; while keeping our standards in tact?<\/p>\n<p>And as for Pennsylvania, can replacing one anti-choice senator with another be a pro-choice victory?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Of all the public policy issues debated in this country, [tag]abortion[\/tag] is by far the trickiest. There&#8217;s just not much room for compromise. If you believe a fertilized egg is a full-fledged human being with all the rights therein, abortion is murder. If you don&#8217;t, a government-imposed ban on the procedure takes away a woman&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7216"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7216\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}