{"id":753,"date":"2003-10-15T12:48:27","date_gmt":"2003-10-15T17:48:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/753.html"},"modified":"2003-10-15T12:48:27","modified_gmt":"2003-10-15T17:48:27","slug":"rich-lowry-tries-to-smear-clinton-accidentally-praises-him","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/rich-lowry-tries-to-smear-clinton-accidentally-praises-him\/","title":{"rendered":"Rich Lowry tries to smear Clinton, accidentally praises him"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I saw (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/weblog\/archives\/2003\/10\/index.html#001675\">via Tapped<\/a>) that National Review&#8217;s Rich Lowry has bottled up all of his hatred of Bill Clinton and bound it together in one handy-dandy new book, Legacy: Paying the Price of the Clinton Years.<\/p>\n<p>After I stopped chuckling over the title (how does a nation &#8220;pay a price&#8221; for unprecedented peace and prosperity?), I did some follow-up to see what Lowry was up to.<\/p>\n<p>Lowry explains in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/lowry\/lowry200310140832.asp\">National Review column<\/a> published yesterday that he spoke to &#8220;a couple dozen former Clinton officials&#8221; to see what kind of dirt he could dig up on the former president for his book. From the looks of things, he didn&#8217;t get much.<\/p>\n<p>Sure, Lowry got a few people to say, on the record, that they disapproved of Clinton&#8217;s Lewinsky behavior. No big shock there; few were bold enough to defend his personal mistakes in this area. And I suppose Lowry thought it was some kind of coup to get Dick Morris to say nasty things about Bill, but no one should seriously find this newsworthy.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, some of his favorite anecdotes from Clinton staffers are unusually weak and do little to actually bolster his case against the former president.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nFor example, Lowry quotes former Clinton lawyer Lanny Davis as saying that Democrats &#8220;abused&#8230;the scandal machinery&#8221; of American politics in the 1980s. Why is this damning evidence against Clinton, who wasn&#8217;t elected until 1992? Lowry doesn&#8217;t say.<\/p>\n<p>Lowry quotes Clinton&#8217;s United Nations Ambassador Richard Holbrooke as saying that many Clinton aides were &#8220;overwhelmed&#8221; and intimated by Colin Powell. Again, I don&#8217;t see how this reflects poorly on Clinton personally.<\/p>\n<p>Best of all, Lowry includes a quote from Howard Paster, a Clinton congressional lobbyist, who is quoted as saying, &#8220;I don&#8217;t think the decisions were consistently ideological, because there were different players in every decision.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now I don&#8217;t know about you, but isn&#8217;t it <i>a good thing<\/i> that Clinton&#8217;s decision making wasn&#8217;t driven by ideology? Lowry includes this quote as if it were proof of yet another Clinton flaw, but it strikes me as a strength. The president heard from different people who came to different conclusions on a given matter and then reached a decision in a non-ideological manner.<\/p>\n<p>This, in contrast to Bush, who hasn&#8217;t the curiosity or the inclination to hear opposing view points on his preconceived (and usually wrong) ideas.<\/p>\n<p>After going over some of Lowry&#8217;s &#8220;evidence&#8221; against Clinton, I&#8217;m left agreeing with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calpundit.com\/archives\/002420.html\">Kevin Drum&#8217;s conclusion<\/a>: &#8220;[I]f these quotes are the worst Lowry could dredge up, Clinton&#8217;s people must have liked him a lot.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I saw (via Tapped) that National Review&#8217;s Rich Lowry has bottled up all of his hatred of Bill Clinton and bound it together in one handy-dandy new book, Legacy: Paying the Price of the Clinton Years. After I stopped chuckling over the title (how does a nation &#8220;pay a price&#8221; for unprecedented peace and prosperity?), [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-753","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/753","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=753"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/753\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=753"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=753"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=753"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}