{"id":7795,"date":"2006-06-28T10:11:14","date_gmt":"2006-06-28T14:11:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=7795"},"modified":"2006-06-28T10:11:14","modified_gmt":"2006-06-28T14:11:14","slug":"the-war-on-the-new-york-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-war-on-the-new-york-times\/","title":{"rendered":"The war on the New York Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dan Froomkin <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/linkset\/2005\/04\/11\/LI2005041100879.html\">summarized<\/a> the problem nicely yesterday: &#8220;In accusing the press &#8212; and specifically, the [tag]New York Times[\/tag] &#8212; of putting American lives at risk, President [tag]Bush[\/tag] and his allies have escalated their ongoing battle with the [tag]media[\/tag] to nuclear proportions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Indeed. We&#8217;ve see Bush and his supporters get upset over media revelations on the White House&#8217;s legally dubious conduct before, but last week&#8217;s reports about Bush&#8217;s secret international [tag]banking[\/tag] surveillance program have raised the temperature from simmer to boil. Phrases such as &#8220;[tag]treason[\/tag],&#8221; &#8220;aiding and abetting,&#8221; and &#8220;siding with al Qaeda&#8221; have all been used, <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200606270010\">rather casually<\/a>, by conservative personalities on mainstream news outlets. As I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/7788.html\">noted<\/a> yesterday, one relatively high-profile right-wing blogger even recommended &#8220;executing&#8221; [tag]journalists[\/tag].<\/p>\n<p>On the Hill, House Homeland Security Chairman [tag]Peter King[\/tag] (R-N.Y.) has called for an &#8220;investigation and prosecution&#8221; of the NYT. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman . [tag]Pat Roberts[\/tag] (R-Kan.) asked for a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/la-na-swift28jun28,1,4814331.story?coll=la-headlines-nation\">formal investigation<\/a> into whether national security had been damaged by the news reports.<\/p>\n<p>And today, congressional [tag]Republicans[\/tag] will stoke the fires a bit more with a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thehill.com\/thehill\/export\/TheHill\/News\/Frontpage\/062806\/nytimes.html\">meaningless [tag]resolution[\/tag]<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>House Republican leaders are expected to introduce a resolution today [tag]condemn[\/tag]ing The New York Times for publishing a story last week that exposed government monitoring of banking records.<\/p>\n<p>The resolution is expected to condemn the leak and publication of classified documents, said one Republican aide with knowledge of the impending legislation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The vote on this may come as early as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.editorandpublisher.com\/eandp\/news\/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002729169\">today<\/a>. It&#8217;s all a lot of grandstanding, of course, but since they don&#8217;t have a legislative agenda to work on, lawmakers have nothing better to do that whine bitterly about out-of-control journalists.<\/p>\n<p>So here&#8217;s a thought: if the media outlets (NYT, LAT, WSJ) have committed treason during a time of war, why not [tag]prosecute[\/tag]?<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nRepublican luminaries such as radio talk show host Melanie Morgan, Ann Coulter, and The Weekly Standard&#8217;s William Kristol have all said the news outlets need to be prosecuted. By way of follow-up, a reporter asked Tony Snow at yesterday&#8217;s briefing if the White House believes the news reports should &#8220;lead to prosecution.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/news\/releases\/2006\/06\/20060627-3.html\">Snow said<\/a>, &#8220;Look let me make this really clear. At the [tag]White House[\/tag], we don&#8217;t do legal referrals. That&#8217;s the business of other people. I&#8217;m not getting involved in it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But why not? If the White House believes a crime has been committed, it has the option &#8212; one might say it even has the <em>obligation<\/em> &#8212; to refer the matter to the Justice Department for a criminal investigation. Except, in this case, the Bush gang appears unwilling to do so.<\/p>\n<p>In trying to understand why that isn&#8217;t happening, Greg Sargent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.prospect.org\/horsesmouth\/2006\/06\/post_166.html\">narrowed down<\/a> the possible motivations for the Bush gang.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>1) Officials won&#8217;t act aggressively against an institution they&#8217;re claiming puts American lives at risk, because it&#8217;s <i>politically untenable<\/i>. That would mean the administration is putting politics ahead of aggressively prosecuting behavior <i>it says<\/i> endangers American lives. Or:<\/p>\n<p>2) The administration doesn&#8217;t genuinely believe The Times has put our national security at risk at all, and hence won&#8217;t act. If this is the case, both Snow and Cheney blatantly and repeatedly lied.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I suppose it&#8217;s possible option #3 is that the administration has too much respect for the First Amendment guarantees on freedom of the press, but since it&#8217;s hard to even type that with a straight face, I think Sargent&#8217;s two choices are compelling. Going after news outlets would be politically dangerous or is substantively unnecessary. (Or, I suppose, it could be both.)<\/p>\n<p>But doesn&#8217;t that lead us to a put-up-or-shut-up moment? If the reports are accurate and fair accounts of a legitimate news story, Bush and his allies should stop whining. If the reports are literally treasonous, then call the FBI. The GOP machine seems to have picked a spot in the middle: hollow bluster.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dan Froomkin summarized the problem nicely yesterday: &#8220;In accusing the press &#8212; and specifically, the [tag]New York Times[\/tag] &#8212; of putting American lives at risk, President [tag]Bush[\/tag] and his allies have escalated their ongoing battle with the [tag]media[\/tag] to nuclear proportions.&#8221; Indeed. We&#8217;ve see Bush and his supporters get upset over media revelations on the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7795\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}