{"id":7822,"date":"2006-06-30T14:12:01","date_gmt":"2006-06-30T18:12:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/?p=7822"},"modified":"2006-06-30T14:12:01","modified_gmt":"2006-06-30T18:12:01","slug":"he-acts-less-like-the-president-than-like-the-head-of-the-rnc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/he-acts-less-like-the-president-than-like-the-head-of-the-rnc\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;He acts less like the president than like the head of the RNC&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Liberal hawk [tag]Peter Beinart[\/tag] has a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/doc.mhtml?i=20060710&#038;s=trb071006\">fascinating item<\/a> in the upcoming issue of The New Republic in which he notes what many of us have recognized for a very long time: the [tag]Bush[\/tag] [tag]White House[\/tag] will always put political gain above everything else. Even winning a [tag]war[\/tag].<\/p>\n<p>As Beinart sees it, conditions in [tag]Iraq[\/tag] are still &#8220;desperate,&#8221; but several recent events have created an opportunity for the president. Bush could, Beinart argues, reach out to Dems, form a consensus approach to the war, and take a huge leap forward in helping to resolve the crisis.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Were he interested in such a deal, Bush would have invited top [tag]Democrats[\/tag] into his office after the formation of Iraq&#8217;s new government and the death of Abu Musab Al Zarqawi and said something like this. &#8220;If you resist a withdrawal plan so the Iraqis can announce their own, I&#8217;ll bring you in on the negotiations. In fact, I&#8217;ll replace Donald [tag]Rumsfeld[\/tag] with a secretary of defense that you trust &#8212; why don&#8217;t you suggest a few names. And, if you don&#8217;t demagogue this amnesty stuff, I&#8217;ll tell [tag]Karl Rove[\/tag] and his henchmen to stop calling you cowardly defeatists. That might hurt me this November, since slandering Democrats is my best chance of luring [tag]Republicans[\/tag] to the polls. But I&#8217;m more interested in winning Iraq than winning Ohio. And, to do that, I need your help.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>At this point, I had to stop reading temporarily because I could no longer see the page through the tears generated by my hysterical laughter. Honestly, Beinart&#8217;s imagination is more creative than mine could ever be &#8212; because I <i>never<\/i> could have created a scenario in which Bush reached out to Democrats like this.<\/p>\n<p>There are elements of Beinart&#8217;s article with which I disagree, but his broader point is quite right &#8212; Bush considers the war just another political tool. It&#8217;s to be used to win elections, not to spread democracy or &#8220;liberate&#8221; anyone.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nIndeed, Beinart seems mildly disappointed that Dems would demagogue the heck out of [tag]amnesty[\/tag] for Iraqi insurgents, but seems to appreciate the fact that the party a) is only following Bush&#8217;s lead; and b) doesn&#8217;t have much of a choice politically.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Rove and company immediately wielded Zarqawi&#8217;s death as a partisan club, saying that, if Democrats had their way, he&#8217;d still be loose. Then the White House and congressional Republicans rigged a phony, vicious Iraq debate in Congress, which saw Republicans call the main Democratic Senate plan (which didn&#8217;t include a strict withdrawal timetable) &#8220;cut and jog&#8221; &#8212; only to announce days later that the Bush administration was considering something similar itself. All of which made Democrats trying to decide what was best for the country &#8212; as opposed to merely their party &#8212; look like chumps. Partisan acrimony, already stratospheric before the Iraq debate, is now even worse. And, among Democrats, the likely result will be greater demands for a public timetable for withdrawal and louder denunciations of amnesty for insurgents. (In Tennessee, Democratic Senate hopeful Harold Ford is already running ads on the subject.) It&#8217;s hard to serve the national interest when the president of the United States does not.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>George &#8220;a uniter, not a divider&#8221; Bush has <i>repeatedly<\/i> been confronted with historic opportunities to govern with bi-partisan support and reach out to build consensus on national security and foreign policy issues. And he&#8217;s <i>always<\/i> done the exact opposite because he thought, usually correctly, that his party could capitalize on polarization. After 9\/11 &#8230; creating the Department of Homeland Security &#8230; before the invasion of Iraq &#8230; throughout the war itself &#8230; domestic surveillance and the Patriot Act &#8230; in each instance, Bush has treated his domestic rivals as enemies. Even when he <i>could<\/i> strive for consensus, he declined &#8212; because [tag]consensus[\/tag] isn&#8217;t part of the political strategy.<\/p>\n<p>Naturally, with the war in Iraq in its fourth year, Bush sees no reason to change the game plan now. It&#8217;s sad, but it appears Bush knows no other way. As Beinart put it, &#8220;He acts less like the president than like the head of the Republican National Committee&#8230;. And, if we lose in Iraq, it will be a major reason why.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Liberal hawk [tag]Peter Beinart[\/tag] has a fascinating item in the upcoming issue of The New Republic in which he notes what many of us have recognized for a very long time: the [tag]Bush[\/tag] [tag]White House[\/tag] will always put political gain above everything else. Even winning a [tag]war[\/tag]. As Beinart sees it, conditions in [tag]Iraq[\/tag] are [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7822"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7822\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}