{"id":8114,"date":"2006-08-03T16:24:19","date_gmt":"2006-08-03T20:24:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8114.html"},"modified":"2006-08-03T16:24:19","modified_gmt":"2006-08-03T20:24:19","slug":"voters-look-up-to-war-heroes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/voters-look-up-to-war-heroes\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Voters look up to war heroes&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jim Pinkerton had an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsday.com\/news\/columnists\/ny-oppin034838167aug03,0,5799414.column?coll=ny-news-columnists\">interesting column<\/a> in Newsday today about the tendency of voters to &#8220;look up to war heroes.&#8221; As he sees it, this makes John McCain the odds-on favorite to win not only the GOP nomination in 2008, but also the presidency. With all due respect to Pinkerton &#8212; a professor from my grad school &#8212; there are two important words missing from his piece.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In times of war, warriors tend to rise to the top in politics. That&#8217;s good news for war veterans seeking elective office and bad news for non-vets of both genders. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Today, relatively few Americans are involved with the armed services&#8230;. So when the real thing comes along &#8211; defined as comradeship, blood sacrifice and national honor &#8211; the voters snap to salute. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Times of war are times for heroes. That&#8217;s good news for McCain, politically, and bad for just about every other &#8217;08 hopeful. The other men, and women, who might be eyeing the White House will discover that talking the tough talk is a poor substitute for having walked the tough walk &#8211; the path of glory.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The two words missing from this analysis, of course, are &#8220;John Kerry.&#8221;<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nI used to find Pinkerton&#8217;s thesis fairly compelling. Americans generally celebrate military service and hold decorated military heroes in the highest regard. But whether &#8220;voters snap to salute&#8221; is another matter entirely &#8212; recent history suggests the electorate appreciates those who wear a uniform, but it hardly guarantees campaign success.<\/p>\n<p>Consider this tidbit: in the last four presidential elections, the candidate with less military experience beat the candidate with more military experience.<\/p>\n<p>For that matter, those who followed a &#8220;path of glory&#8221; aren&#8217;t even guaranteed so much as a &#8220;thank you&#8221; on the campaign trail. John Kerry&#8217;s heroic service was not only questioned, it was smeared, mocked, and trivialized &#8212; all to benefit someone who <a href=\"http:\/\/dir.salon.com\/story\/news\/feature\/2004\/09\/14\/bush_service\/index.html\">lied about his military service<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usnews.com\/usnews\/news\/articles\/roane040908.htm\">failed to show up for duty<\/a> during a time of war.<\/p>\n<p>If Pinkerton&#8217;s right, 2004 shouldn&#8217;t have been close. It was a time of war, and voters had a choice between a hero and a candidate filled with &#8220;tough talk.&#8221; If memory serves, Pinkerton&#8217;s thesis didn&#8217;t hold together. The same goes for the 2000 primaries, when the Republican establishment and rank-and-file backed Bush over McCain in large numbers.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t doubt a strong military record can be a valuable asset in a presidential campaign, but if recent history has taught us anything, it&#8217;s that voters won&#8217;t necessarily reward heroic military service. Dems learned that lesson the hard way two years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Campaigns are always about the future &#8212; to think McCain or anyone else can have the edge based on what happened 30 years ago is mistaken.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jim Pinkerton had an interesting column in Newsday today about the tendency of voters to &#8220;look up to war heroes.&#8221; As he sees it, this makes John McCain the odds-on favorite to win not only the GOP nomination in 2008, but also the presidency. With all due respect to Pinkerton &#8212; a professor from my [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8114","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8114","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8114"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8114\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}