{"id":8312,"date":"2006-08-28T10:27:16","date_gmt":"2006-08-28T14:27:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8312.html"},"modified":"2006-08-28T10:27:16","modified_gmt":"2006-08-28T14:27:16","slug":"the-latest-in-a-long-line-of-missile-defense-tests","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/the-latest-in-a-long-line-of-missile-defense-tests\/","title":{"rendered":"The latest in a long line of missile-defense &#8216;tests&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In July, the Washington Examiner ran <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/a-168837~Editorial__Where_are__Star_Wars__critics_now_.html\">an item<\/a> that said the U.S. has a system in place that &#8220;is poised to shoot down anything launched from [tag]North Korea[\/tag] that threatens the American homeland or the critical interests of our regional allies like Japan and Australia.&#8221; This development, the piece argues, has led long-time skeptics to become &#8220;noticeably absent,&#8221; as if our defenses have finally reached a point that proves the merit behind the missile-defense idea.<\/p>\n<p>Around the same time, I saw one far-right blog <a href=\"http:\/\/allthingsconservative.typepad.com\/all_things_conservative\/2006\/06\/thank_god_for_r.html\">argue<\/a> that the Pentagon&#8217;s decision to turn on the [tag]missile defense[\/tag] system is proof that &#8220;liberals were on the wrong side of history.&#8221; The post went on to say, &#8220;If not for Ronald Reagan, and his vision and leadership, we would now be at the mercy of that lunatic in North Korea.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>As it turns out, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2006-08-27-rumsfeld_x.htm\">even Donald [tag]Rumsfeld[\/tag]<\/a> isn&#8217;t prepared to endorse such an idea.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>After his first look inside the nerve center of the U.S. missile defense system, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Sunday sounded a note of caution about expectations that interceptors poised in underground silos here would work in the event of a missile attack by North Korea. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>Asked at a news conference later whether he believed the missile shield was ready for use against a North Korean missile like the one test-fired unsuccessfully on July 4, Rumsfeld said he would not be fully persuaded until the multibillion dollar defense system has undergone more complete and realistic testing.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Suggesting that he&#8217;d like to see a &#8220;full end-to-end&#8221; demonstration, Rumsfeld added, &#8220;That just hasn&#8217;t happened.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I mention this not just to refute misplaced conservative boasts from earlier this summer, but also to provide a context for this week&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/nationworld\/nation\/la-na-missile28aug28,1,7634695.story?coll=la-headlines-nation\">major test<\/a> of the U.S. missile defense system, scheduled for Thursday, which will be the fullest assessment since embarrassing failures grounded the program 18 months ago.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Although a target missile will be fired from Kodiak Island, Alaska, and an interceptor rocket topped with a &#8220;kill vehicle&#8221; will launch from California&#8217;s Vandenberg Air Force Base, military and industry officials say the goal isn&#8217;t to actually shoot down the missile.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are not going to try to hit the target,&#8221; said Scott Fancher, head of Boeing Co.&#8217;s ground-based missile defense program. &#8220;It is not a primary or secondary test objective to hit the target.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Maybe the test will work, maybe it won&#8217;t; we&#8217;ll know more later this week. But I think it&#8217;s worth noting that after all of these years of development, and all the billions of dollars in investment, we&#8217;re about to conduct a test to see if the system is simply capable of <i>spotting<\/i> the target.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a reminder of just how little this program <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2006\/07\/05\/rohrbacher-missile-defense\/\">has actually produced<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>* The Pentagon&#8217;s Ground-based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system <a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensetech.org\/archives\/002515.html\">hasn&#8217;t successfully intercepted a missile<\/a> since October of 2002&#8230;. And the last two times it tried to hit an oncoming missile, <strong>the interceptor didn&#8217;t even leave the ground<\/strong>. Things have gotten so bad that the Missile Defense Agency&#8217;s independent review team concluded last year that more tests may only undermine the GMD&#8217;s value as a deterrent.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* A recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dodig.mil\/Audit\/reports\/FY06\/06060sum.htm\">Pentagon Inspector General report<\/a> found that <strong>security vulnerabilities are so serious<\/strong> &#8220;that the agency and its contractor, Boeing, <a href=\"http:\/\/fcw.com\/article92640-03-16-06-Web\">may not be able to prevent misuse of the system<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>* &#8220;A little-noticed study by the Government Accountability Office issued in March found that program officials were <a href=\"http:\/\/seattletimes.nwsource.com\/html\/nationworld\/2003105209_antimissile23.html\">so concerned with potential flaws<\/a> in the first nine interceptors now in operation that they considered taking them out of their silos and <strong>returning them to their manufacturer for &#8216;disassembly and remanufacture.'&#8221;<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Just to be clear, I&#8217;d be thrilled if we had an effective defense system that could shoot down threatening missiles. But we don&#8217;t, and the one we&#8217;re working on may never offer a realistic defense. That doesn&#8217;t mean critics of the system are &#8220;on the wrong side of history&#8221;; it just means we&#8217;re the ones paying attention to whether the darn thing actually works.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In July, the Washington Examiner ran an item that said the U.S. has a system in place that &#8220;is poised to shoot down anything launched from [tag]North Korea[\/tag] that threatens the American homeland or the critical interests of our regional allies like Japan and Australia.&#8221; This development, the piece argues, has led long-time skeptics to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8312"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8312\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}