{"id":8492,"date":"2006-09-18T09:45:14","date_gmt":"2006-09-18T13:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8492.html"},"modified":"2006-09-18T09:45:14","modified_gmt":"2006-09-18T13:45:14","slug":"yoo-spells-it-out-for-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/yoo-spells-it-out-for-us\/","title":{"rendered":"Yoo spells it out for us"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Anyone who has followed the administration&#8217;s assault on the rule of law is familiar with the work of John Yoo, the former Justice Department lawyer and current Berkley law professor. Yesterday, Yoo did all of us a small favor: he put his entire twisted approach to the law in a single <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/09\/17\/opinion\/17yoo.html?ex=1316145600&#038;en=2db683b71a2b4606&#038;ei=5090&#038;partner=rssuserland&#038;emc=rss\">New York Times op-ed<\/a>, making it easier for the nation to have a single, handy guide to the bizarre theories that justify the Bush administration&#8217;s conduct.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To his critics, Mr. Bush is a &#8220;King George&#8221; bent on an &#8220;imperial presidency.&#8221; But the inescapable fact is that war shifts power to the branch most responsible for its waging: the executive.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, the critics are right. We&#8217;re saying the president is engaged in an audacious power-grab, and Yoo responds by arguing that Bush <i>should<\/i> engage in an audacious power-grab.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The White House has declared that the Constitution allows the president to sidestep laws that invade his executive authority. That is why Mr. Bush has issued hundreds of signing statements &#8212; more than any previous president &#8212; reserving his right not to enforce unconstitutional laws.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Consider what Yoo is saying in print here: the president can decide to &#8220;sidestep&#8221; the law. He can also issue a statement explaining that he&#8217;ll ignore laws he believes are wrong.<\/p>\n<p>And who gets to decide which laws &#8220;invade&#8221; the president&#8217;s executive authority? According to Yoo, the president does.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nYoo envisions, and successfully urged his former administration colleagues to accept, a presidency without limits. Launching a pre-emptive war against a country that isn&#8217;t a threat? No problem. Ignoring existing law to spy on Americans? Sounds good. Detaining suspects without charges and torturing them? A-OK. Terminating old international treaties and blowing off new ones? Just another day at the office.<\/p>\n<p>As my friend Michael J.W. Stickings <a href=\"http:\/\/the-reaction.blogspot.com\/2006\/09\/john-yoo-is-dangerous-idiot.html\">put it<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>What Yoo has provided is essentially a laundry list of Bush&#8217;s abuses of power while in the Oval Office. [For] that I thank him. I&#8217;m not sure anyone else has done it so succinctly, or at least so succinctly without even a trace of irony. All this is <i>good<\/i>, according to Yoo&#8230;. [H]e makes his case in all seriousness.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe, but it&#8217;s true. This charlatan believes the best way to defend Bush against charges of abuse and lawbreaking is to say abuse and lawbreaking are inherently good. <i>Of course<\/i> Bush is breaking the law, Yoo seems to be saying; he&#8217;s the <i>president<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>Bush will leave office in January 2009, but I often wonder if the United States will ever be the same.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Anyone who has followed the administration&#8217;s assault on the rule of law is familiar with the work of John Yoo, the former Justice Department lawyer and current Berkley law professor. Yesterday, Yoo did all of us a small favor: he put his entire twisted approach to the law in a single New York Times op-ed, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8492","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8492","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8492"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8492\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8492"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8492"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8492"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}