{"id":8539,"date":"2006-09-22T13:38:23","date_gmt":"2006-09-22T17:38:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8539.html"},"modified":"2006-09-22T13:38:23","modified_gmt":"2006-09-22T17:38:23","slug":"votevetsorg-ad-takes-a-shot-but-stays-intact","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/votevetsorg-ad-takes-a-shot-but-stays-intact\/","title":{"rendered":"VoteVets.org ad takes a shot, but stays intact"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8457.html\">noted<\/a> last week that VoteVets.org unveiled one of the campaign season&#8217;s most effective ads in Virginia, criticizing Sen. George Allen (R) for his vote against body armor funding in 2003. The ad drew such a positive response, and garnered so much support, VoteVets.org brought its ad to Pennsylvania to take on Sen. Rick Santorum (R).<\/p>\n<p>The ad, however, quickly drew scrutiny. FactCheck.org, a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania and which often has non-partisan credibility, <a href=\"http:\/\/factcheck.org\/article438.html\">said the ad is false<\/a>. Allen and Senate Republicans, FactCheck.org said, never voted against supplemental funding for body armor. The accusation, it said, is &#8220;just plain wrong.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So, who&#8217;s right? Media Matters <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/items\/200609220002\">sets the record straight<\/a>. Fortunately, the Senate record supports the VoteVets&#8217; charge.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In recent days, both The Arizona Republic editorial page and the website FactCheck.org have attacked as &#8220;deceitful&#8221; and &#8220;just plain wrong&#8221; a television advertisement by the newly formed group Vote Vets criticizing Sen. George F. Allen (R-VA) for his April 2003 opposition to a Democratic amendment that would have increased U.S. National Guard funding for body armor.<\/p>\n<p>While the Republic and FactCheck have conceded that Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA), the amendment&#8217;s sponsor, made clear in a press release that the $1 billion measure included funding for helmets and bulletproof vests, both outlets have nonetheless argued that, because Landrieu did not specify &#8220;body armor&#8221; as a &#8220;priority&#8221; when discussing the legislation on the Senate floor, the assertion that Allen voted against body armor is &#8220;false&#8221; and &#8220;scandalous.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But regardless of whether Landrieu specifically cited &#8220;body armor,&#8221; she repeatedly stated on the floor that the bill would ensure that National Guard soldiers had &#8220;helmets&#8221; and other &#8220;force protection&#8221; equipment intended to &#8220;minimize causalities.&#8221; More important, in their defense of Allen, the Republic falsely suggested &#8212; and FactCheck falsely asserted &#8212; that Allen and his Republican colleagues have never voted against supplemental funding for body armor. In fact, six months later, they opposed an amendment offered by Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT), which would have provided additional funding explicitly for body armor.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tpmmuckraker.com\/archives\/001588.php\">statement<\/a> to TPM Muckraker, VoteVets.org spokesman Eric Schmeltzer applauded the work of Media Matters. &#8220;The record is as clear as day on this vote, and MediaMatters has exposed FactCheck&#8217;s sloppy and false work for what it is.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now we know.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I noted last week that VoteVets.org unveiled one of the campaign season&#8217;s most effective ads in Virginia, criticizing Sen. George Allen (R) for his vote against body armor funding in 2003. The ad drew such a positive response, and garnered so much support, VoteVets.org brought its ad to Pennsylvania to take on Sen. Rick Santorum [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8539","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8539","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8539"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8539\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8539"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8539"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8539"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}