{"id":8557,"date":"2006-09-25T12:58:22","date_gmt":"2006-09-25T16:58:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8557.html"},"modified":"2006-09-25T12:58:22","modified_gmt":"2006-09-25T16:58:22","slug":"clinton-v-wallace-redux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/clinton-v-wallace-redux\/","title":{"rendered":"Clinton v. Wallace &#8212; redux"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t want to belabor the point, but Bill Clinton&#8217;s interview with Chris Wallace &#8212; the former president&#8217;s first-ever chat with Fox News &#8212; has become one of the more interesting political showdowns in quite a while.<\/p>\n<p>If you were out of the loop over the weekend, Clinton sat down with Wallace, ostensibly to discuss the Clinton Global Initiative. As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crooksandliars.com\/2006\/09\/24\/fox-clinton-interview-part-1-osama-bin-laden\/\">this video<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2006\/09\/22\/clinton-fox\/\">this transcript<\/a> demonstrate, the interview became a heated discussion about Clinton&#8217;s counter-terrorism efforts as president.<\/p>\n<p>Some of Clinton&#8217;s far-right critics have suggested that the former president somehow lost his cool. Nonsense. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crooksandliars.com\/2006\/09\/24\/fox-clinton-interview-part-1-osama-bin-laden\/\">Watch the clip<\/a>. Clinton certainly felt <em>strongly<\/em> about the subject at hand, but his responses were forceful and factual. Every word was not only true, but an assertive, detailed response to conservative propaganda.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, Clinton&#8217;s office had some <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/front\/story\/455080p-382896c.html\">good advice<\/a> to Dems who caught the interview.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;CGI is a nonpartisan event, and so we thought it would be fair to do Fox News Sunday&#8230; When Wallace hid behind his viewers and attacked President Clinton&#8217;s record on terror, President Clinton fought back hard, just like any Democrat should when they are attacked with a baseless attack,&#8221; said Clinton spokesman Jay Carson.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Note <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/print?id=156238&#038;cacheKill=321999\">referred<\/a> to this today as the &#8220;Chappaqua Hint,&#8221; meaning that Clinton&#8217;s forceful response was meant &#8220;to set an example for how [Clinton aides] want the party to behave between now and Election Day.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I can only hope so.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nA few other Clinton v. Wallace notes to consider:<\/p>\n<p>* From today&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americanprogressaction.org\/site\/apps\/nl\/newsletter2.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&#038;b=917053\">Progress Report<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Clinton pressed Wallace on why he had never asked the Bush administration why it demoted Clarke. Wallace claimed &#8220;we asked&#8221; and shot back, &#8220;a href=&#8221;http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/clinton-interview&#8221;>Do you ever watch Fox News Sunday, sir?&#8221; In fact, a Progress Report analysis found that, since 2001, Wallace has interviewed the top national security officials from the Bush administration &#8212; Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Hadley &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2006\/09\/23\/wallace-cole\/\">42 times<\/a>. According to a Lexis-Nexis database search, he never asked any of them why Clarke was demoted, nor did he ask why they <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2006\/09\/23\/wallace-cole\/\">failed to respond to the USS Cole attack<\/a>. Days after it was revealed that President Bush had received a President&#8217;s Daily Brief that said &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2004\/ALLPOLITICS\/04\/10\/august6.memo\/\">Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S.<\/a>,&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2006\/09\/23\/wallace-rice-pdb\/\">Wallace did not even bring it up<\/a> in an interview with former National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>* After the interview aired, Wallace suggested he was <a href=\"http:\/\/washingtontimes.com\/national\/20060924-114504-8237r.htm\">physically frightened<\/a> of Clinton.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In an interview yesterday with MediaBistro.com, Mr. Wallace noted that Mr. Clinton is &#8220;a very big man&#8221; and that he thought the former president was trying to intimidate him by getting angry.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As he leaned forward &#8212; wagging his finger in my face and then poking the notes I was holding &#8212; I felt as if a mountain was coming down in front of me,&#8221; Mr. Wallace said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure what to make of this. Wallace was, what, afraid Clinton would beat him up?<\/p>\n<p>* And Glenn Greenwald had a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/politics\/war_room\/2006\/09\/25\/clinton\/index.html\">good item<\/a> about the conservative talking point blaming Clinton&#8217;s handling of Somalia for the growth of al Qaeda. Clinton explained the issue to Wallace, but as Greenwald noted, &#8220;If anything, Clinton understated his own defense.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, I don&#8217;t imagine Clinton will be going back onto Fox News anytime soon, but all in all, I&#8217;m delighted he did this interview and said what needed to be said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I don&#8217;t want to belabor the point, but Bill Clinton&#8217;s interview with Chris Wallace &#8212; the former president&#8217;s first-ever chat with Fox News &#8212; has become one of the more interesting political showdowns in quite a while. If you were out of the loop over the weekend, Clinton sat down with Wallace, ostensibly to discuss [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8557\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}