{"id":8577,"date":"2006-09-26T16:26:33","date_gmt":"2006-09-26T20:26:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com\/archives\/8577.html"},"modified":"2006-09-26T16:26:33","modified_gmt":"2006-09-26T20:26:33","slug":"condi-rice-re-fighting-910","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/condi-rice-re-fighting-910\/","title":{"rendered":"Condi Rice, re-fighting 9\/10"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Note <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/print?id=156238\">suggested<\/a> this morning that Bill Clinton&#8217;s appearance\/smackdown on Fox News may have been &#8220;a paradigm-shifting moment&#8221; for Democrats. It struck me as wildly hyperbolic &#8212; will the interview still dominate the political discourse a month from now? &#8212; but I think it&#8217;s fair to say Clinton&#8217;s hard-hitting responses have certainly gotten the right&#8217;s attention.<\/p>\n<p>For example, in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nypost.com\/seven\/09252006\/news\/nationalnews\/rice_boils_over_at_bubba_nationalnews_.htm\">Secretary of State&#8217;s office<\/a>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday accused Bill Clinton of making &#8220;flatly false&#8221; claims that the Bush administration didn&#8217;t lift a finger to stop terrorism before the 9\/11 attacks.<\/p>\n<p>Rice hammered Clinton, who leveled his charges in a contentious weekend interview with Chris Wallace of Fox News Channel, for his claims that the Bush administration &#8220;did not try&#8221; to kill Osama bin Laden in the eight months they controlled the White House before the Sept. 11 attacks. [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What we did in the eight months was at least as aggressive as what the Clinton administration did in the preceding years,&#8221; Rice added.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think Rice misread the talking points. The right isn&#8217;t supposed to believe Bush was &#8220;as aggressive&#8221; as Clinton on counter-terrorism; the line is that Bush was <i>more<\/i> aggressive than Clinton.<\/p>\n<p>Not that it matters &#8212; in either case, Rice is simply, demonstrably wrong. Indeed, it&#8217;s odd that she&#8217;s pick this fight in light of the evidence.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nI&#8217;ll spare you a voluminous post, instead offering links to the key details:<\/p>\n<p>* Rice&#8217;s claims are <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/2006\/09\/26\/rice-clinton-terrorism\/\">flatly<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mahablog.com\/2006\/09\/26\/condiliar-strikes-back\/\">contradicted<\/a> by the 9\/11 Commission.<\/p>\n<p>* Rice&#8217;s claims are flatly <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dscc.org\/news\/roundup\/20060926_condi\/\">contradicted<\/a> by former Bush administration officials.<\/p>\n<p>* And Rice&#8217;s claims are flatly contradicted by a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rawstory.com\/news\/2006\/2001_memo_to_Rice_contradicts_statements_0926.html\">memo she received<\/a> shortly after becoming National Security Advisor.<\/p>\n<p>And as long as we&#8217;re on the subject, if the administration <i>really<\/i> wants to seriously point fingers here, I&#8217;d also recommend reviewing 9\/11 Commission member Richard Ben-Veniste&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.crooksandliars.com\/2006\/09\/26\/what-did-bush-do-about-the-cole\/\">latest comments<\/a>; the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/06\/19\/AR2006061901211.html\">opening anecdote<\/a> from &#8220;The One Percent Doctrine&#8221;; and Joe Conason&#8217;s pre-Richard Clarke piece for Salon, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/archive.salon.com\/politics\/feature\/2002\/01\/15\/clinton\/index_np.html\">Don&#8217;t Blame Clinton<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Why the administration and its allies would want to have this fight all over again is a mystery. Were the facts not clear enough the last time?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Note suggested this morning that Bill Clinton&#8217;s appearance\/smackdown on Fox News may have been &#8220;a paradigm-shifting moment&#8221; for Democrats. It struck me as wildly hyperbolic &#8212; will the interview still dominate the political discourse a month from now? &#8212; but I think it&#8217;s fair to say Clinton&#8217;s hard-hitting responses have certainly gotten the right&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[617],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8577"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8577\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stevebenen.com\/thecarpetbaggerreport\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}